The Oklahoman

What we know from Oath Keepers trial

- Ella Lee

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Prosecutor­s presented encrypted messages, a secret recording and witness testimony in the case against the right-wing militia group Oath Keepers last week, a potential sign of what could be ahead as the trial moves into Week 2 on Tuesday.

Leader Stewart Rhodes and four other members of the Oath Keepers – Ohioan Jessica Watkins, Virginian Thomas Caldwell and Floridians Kelly Meggs and Ken Harrelson – face numerous charges in connection with the Jan. 6 Capitol attack; the trial began in federal court last week.

Here’s everything we learned during the first week of the Oath Keepers’ trial.

Both sides lay out roadmaps The prosecutio­n:

h The government painted members of the Oath Keepers as mastermind­s behind a long-planned and carefully coordinate­d plot to stop the peaceful transfer of presidenti­al power on Jan. 6, 2021 – by any means necessary.

h “Notice the role these five defendants played: leaders,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Nestler said in the government’s opening remarks.

h Stewart Rhodes – a Yale-educated, eye-patch wearing founder of the Oath Keepers – is the leader of them all, the prosecutio­n argued. During the Capitol attack, Rhodes remained outside the building “like a general overlookin­g a battlefield while his troops stormed inside,” Nestler said.

The defense:

h Defense attorneys for Rhodes and his four co-defendants say the government’s portrayal of the Oath Keepers and its members is wrong.

h “Improper context can mislead and lead to improper conclusion­s,” Jonathan Crisp, Watkins’ attorney, said in his opening remarks.

The evidence

Prosecutor­s showed evidence that the Oath Keepers began planning for a violent confrontat­ion in Washington

D.C. the same day Joe Biden was named president-elect. Rhodes wrote in a Nov. 7, 2020, chat on Signal, an encrypted messaging app, to other Oath Keepers that they must refuse to accept his nomination and get their “gear squared away and ready to fight.”

On a Nov. 9 conference call among more than 100 Oath Keepers, secretly recorded by one attendee, Rhodes spelled out plans to travel to Washington for the Million MAGA March later that month, where thousands gathered to protest purported election fraud. No widespread election fraud has ever been found in the 2020 election.

Defendants Watkins and Meggs, also on the call, weighed which weapons could be legally brought into Washington, like pepper spray, tasers and stun guns – “and it doesn’t hurt to have a lead pipe with a flag on it,” Meggs said. Many of the plans discussed on the call were later replicated or refined on Jan. 6, prosecutor­s alleged.

“We’re not getting out of this without a fight,” Rhodes said on the call.

A Dec. 2, 2020, document titled “OP PLAN D.C. FIRST DRAFT,” created by defendant Caldwell, laid out an early operation plan for the Oath Keepers, the prosecutio­n alleged. In it, Caldwell suggests bringing “striking weapons” and includes a link to a tactical camping tomahawk ax called “Zombie Killer.”

He also suggests burner phones and unregister­ed weapons, noting that it would “lend credence to plausible deniabilit­y.” Those weapons should be wiped down and discarded as soon as practicabl­e, Caldwell wrote in the document.

The testimony

Six witnesses called by the prosecutio­n have offered insight into the Oath Keepers’ organizati­on, collective psyche and plans ahead of Jan. 6.

h FBI Special Agent Michael Palianwas sent to the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, after violence broke out that day. He described the scene as looking like a “bomb had gone off in there.” Much of the prosecutio­n’s message and audio evidence was verified and analyzed by Palian.

h Former Oath Keeper John Zimmerman, who led a North Carolina chapter of the group, detailed their plan to travel to Washington for the Million MAGA March in November 2020. Concerned about violence from “BLM and Antifa,” the Oath Keepers stockpiled 12-15 long guns in his van outside Washington, in case Trump invoked the Insurrecti­on Act.

h Abdullah Rasheed, a former Oath Keeper from West Virginia, testified that he recorded the Nov. 9, 2020, call. “The more I listened to the call, it sounded like we were going to war against the United States government,” he told the jury. The defense sought to discredit Rasheed by pointing to a prior felony conviction.

h Former Oath Keeper Michael Adams testified that he rebooted and led the Florida chapter of the organizati­on. He said he resigned from his position in December 2020 due to the Oath Keepers’ “posture as a militia group,” which he found “problemati­c.”

h U.S. Capitol Police Special Agent Ryan McCamley testified to Rhodes’ presence in Washington on Dec. 12, where the militia leader later said at a rally that if Trump did not invoke the Insurrecti­on Act, “we’re going to have to do it ourselves later, in a much more desperate, much more bloody war.” McCamley confirmed during cross-examinatio­n by the defense that he did not witness Rhodes engaged in anything illegal.

h FBI Special Agent Byron Cody began testifying Friday about Rhodes’ public pleas to Trump to invoke the Insurrecti­on Act.

What’s next?

h Cody will retake the stand for cross-examinatio­n by Rhodes’ attorneys.

h Prosecutor­s said Friday that two FBI agents who recovered items from defendants Meggs and Watkins’ homes, plus Arizona’s Ernest Hancock, who recorded a video on Jan. 6, could testify. That depends on whether Meggs’ attorney, Stanley Woodward, agrees that the evidence recovered by the FBI and Hancock’s video from Jan. 6 are authentic. If he does not, it would require those individual­s to testify to the evidence’s authentici­ty.

h Hancock has attempted to invoke the Fifth Amendment, prosecutor­s said, though they do not believe he holds that right under these circumstan­ces.

 ?? SUSAN WALSH/AP ?? Defense attorneys for Stewart Rhodes, middle, and his four co-defendants say the government’s portrayal of the Oath Keepers and its members is wrong.
SUSAN WALSH/AP Defense attorneys for Stewart Rhodes, middle, and his four co-defendants say the government’s portrayal of the Oath Keepers and its members is wrong.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States