Attacking attorneys won’t help Florida’s injured workers

I believe it is important to correct misconceptions and misstatements made by the head of the Florida Chamber regarding Florida’s workers’ compensation system, and the attorneys who represent injured Floridians.

In a recent letter, “Legislative fix needed to stop looming crisis in workers’ compensation,” (Oct. 3), Mark Wilson and the Chamber suggest that the workers’ compensation rate increase approved by Florida’s new insurance commissioner benefits only “billboard trial lawyers.” Nothing could be further from the truth.

The commissioner approved a ridiculous 14.5 percent increase in workers’ comp rates. It could have been worse — the insurance industry tried to stick businesses with an increase one-third higher. The insurance industry blames the rate increase on the Florida Supreme Court’s recent Castellanos decision, which threw out unconstitutional caps on attorney fees. But NCCI, the rating arm of the insurance industry, has acknowledged that the court decision has very little direct impact on rates.

The bulk of what the insurance industry sought in a rate increase was, by NCCI’s own admission, related to the fact that injured Floridians who retain attorneys receive more in benefits than workers who do not retain counsel. Yet the decision in Castellanos did not increase the pool of benefits available to injured Floridians.

Wilson and the Chamber would have Florida return to the system enacted in 2003. While the reforms enacted that year generated rate reductions, let’s not pretend these reforms did anything to assure that injured Floridians would receive prompt medical care or lost wage benefits. The exact opposite happened. Let’s also not pretend that the caps on attorney fees adopted in 2003 were reasonable. The Chamber supported the Legislature removing the word “reasonable” from the fee statute in 2009. Finally, let’s not pretend that attorneys accept workers’ compensation cases to “hit the jackpot” on fee awards.

The Chamber points out correctly that the attorney who represented Marvin Castellanos ultimately earned a fee many times the value of the benefits the carrier refused to provide. That begs the question of why the insurance company denied him the benefits in the first place — and why they then fought so hard to avoid providing the benefits. Insurance executives may not understand, but an $800 benefit means everything to a family that lives from paycheck to paycheck.

Rather than work toward a comprehensive solution, the Florida Chamber chooses to simply demonize attorneys. If the Chamber were truly interested in the welfare of injured workers and in assuring that these workers receive access to quality care and the court system, it would not deny them the opportunity to hire attorneys at reasonable fees.