The Palm Beach Post

Judge to Uber: Return Waymo files

Order bars Uber from using self-driving technology that star engineer took before he left rival Waymo.

- By Tom Krisher Associated Press Associated Press writer Dee-Ann Durbin contribute­d to this report.

DETROIT — A f e d e r a l j u d ge ’s order that bars Uber from using technology taken by a star engineer before he left Waymo is bad news for Uber and likely will hurt the ride-hailing company’s own self-driving research, according to legal experts.

The ruling by District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco on Monday was mainly a victory for Waymo, the autonomous car unit spun off from Google, even though the judge refused to order a halt to Uber’s autonomous car research as Waymo had requested, the experts said.

Waymo showed “compelling evidence” that a former Waymo engineer named Anthony Levandowsk­i downloaded thousands of confidenti­al files before leaving the company, the order said. Levand- owski set up his own firms, which then were sold to Uber for $680 million. Evidence showed that Levandowsk­i and Uber planned the acquisitio­ns before Levandowsk­i left Waymo, Alsup’s order said.

“He c l e a r l y b e l i e v e s t h a t Levandowsk­i is guilty as sin and that Uber hired him, knowing this full well,” said John Coffee, a Columbia University law professor who specialize­s in white-collar crime and corporate governance.

“He is ruling that some of this informatio­n is stolen (or “misappropr­iated”) and in the long run that will likely have a devastatin­g impact on Uber.”

Waymo sued Uber in February alleging that the ride-hailing company is using stolen self-driving technology to build its own autonomous cars. Monday’s ruling prevents Uber from using the technology on a laser navigation­al tool called Lidar that robotic cars use to see what’s around them.

“The bottom line is the evidence indicates that Uber hired Levandowsk­i even though it knew or should have known that he possessed over 14,000 confidenti­al Waymo files,” Alsup wrote.

“At least some informatio­n from those files, if not the files themselves, has seeped into Uber’s own Lidar developmen­t efforts.” Uber was ordered to return all downloaded materials to Waymo by noon May 31.

Alsup ordered Uber to remove Levandowsk­i from any role in Lidar, and that it stops him from copying or otherwise using the downloaded materials.

Waymo had sought to shut down Uber’s autonomous car program until the dispute is settled. But Alsup determined that Waymo’s patent infringeme­nt theories were too weak to support such an order.

The judge ruled that although it’s hard to imagine that Levand- owski “plundered Waymo’s vault the way he did” with no intent to use the material, Waymo still fell short of showing that the trade secrets were used.

Uber said in a statement Monday that it’s pleased the court allowed it to continue the research, including its own Lidar innovation­s.

“We look forward to moving toward trial and continuing to demonstrat­e that our technology has been built independen­tly from the ground up,” the statement said.

Waymo, which is part of Google parent Alphabet Inc., said it welcomed the order stopping Uber from using “stolen documents containing trade secrets.”

The ruling, coupled with Alsup’s order last week referring the case to federal prosecutor­s, signals that Alsup is leaning toward Waymo based on evidence thus far, said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States