Will Super Bowl win change the passion of Eagles fans?
Jeré Longman, a staff reporter at The New York Times, is the author of a book about Philadelphia fandom, “If Football’s a Religion, Why Don’t We Have a Prayer?”
PHILADELPHIA — A queasy feeling roiled the civic gut for decades: Sporting success in Philadelphia was mainly just disaster that hadn’t happened yet.
Generations of fans grew up with the grim certainty things would not end well for the Eagles, Phillies, 76ers and Flyers.
No team idealized Philadelphia’s view of itself as the Eagles did — the gritty, blue-collar, “Rocky”-esque underdog, good but not quite good enough.
But with Sunday’s 41-33 victory over New England, the Eagles claimed their first Super Bowl title and first NFL championship since 1960. They are now the overdog, not the underdog.
Police greased poles with hydraulic fluid in Center City to try to keep celebrating fans from gaining an unsafe perch.
“It can happen, it can actually happen,” said Linda Harris, 68, a retired customer service agent who wore her Eagles charm bracelet and helmet ring to watch Sunday’s game. “We’re as good as the rest of them.”
Mike Jensen, 46, a painter, told me at the gym Sunday afternoon:
“It will bring closure to your endless nightmare. Finally, we can cash in on the big prize instead of always waiting for something bad to happen.”
But what next? Will this force a reassessment by Philly fans? What will a Super Bowl victory do to their outlook? Will they become more assured, more generous, more impatient? Will this stoke their passion or quell it?
“I think the Philadelphia fans will always be the same passionate (sometimes obnoxious) fans they always were, win or lose,” Anne Clark, matriarch of a family of ardent Eagles fans, said in an email during the game.
“Perhaps it should” change the fans’ mindset, Jack Long, 69, a retired Philadelphia firefighter and paramedic, said at the gym. “You’re no longer the underdog. You’re just another team that needs to show up and spend the money to win.”
Long-suffering fans of the Boston Red Sox, the Chicago Cubs and every team in Cleveland have faced a similar re-evaluation after championships won in recent years. My friend Barbara Huebner, a longtime sports writer in Boston, described herself as “a rabid, live-and-diefor-it Red Sox fan” until the Sox won their first World Series in 86 years in 2004, then followed with two more titles in 2007 and 2013.
Now, Huebner said in an email, with some exceptions, “I pay almost no attention to them anymore.” The attraction, she added, “was all about the suffering, the tragic arc.”
Philadelphia was once the United States’ political and financial capital. But it long ago ceded its primacy to Washington and New York. Sports are the most visible way to show Philly still measures up. But its fans have endured a wounded passion. Until Sunday, Philly’s pro teams had won two titles in 35 years — the Sixers in 1983 and the Phillies in 2008.
A couple of hours after those Phillies won, I interviewed a police officer in the suburb of Havertown. Let’s not get carried away with victory, Officer Ken Krieg told me. “This is Philadelphia. The curse is never really over.”
But the usual gloom was absent this past week.
Edward G. Rendell, a former mayor of Philadelphia and governor of Pennsylvania, said on a postgame show that if star quarterback Carson Wentz fully recovers from a knee injury, “We have a shot to be back here every year for the next five or six.”
For once, Seth Joyner, a former Eagles linebacker said, it would be New England, not Philadelphia, “that gets to spend the offseason in the pit of misery.”