The Palm Beach Post

Administra­tion proposes boosting biofuel quotas

- By Jennifer A. Dlouhy and Mario Parker

Ethanol producers and farmstate leaders blasted a Trump administra­tion proposal that would force refiners to blend more biofuel into petroleum next year, arguing the modest planned increase is undercut by EPA waivers exempting refineries from the mandate.

Under the Environmen­tal Protection Agency proposal released Tuesday, refiners would have to blend 19.88 billion gallons of biofuels next year, a 3.1 percent increase over current quotas. The EPA is proposing to maintain a 15-billion-gallon quota for convention­al renewable fuels such as corn-based ethanol, the maximum allowed under federal law.

The proposed 2019 target for advanced biofuels would be 4.88 billion gallons, including at least 381 million gallons of cellulosic renewable fuel, such as ethanol made from switchgras­s. The EPA also outlined a potential 2.43 billion gallon quota for biodiesel in 2020, a 15.7 percent increase from the 2.1 billion gallons required in 2019.

But that failed to satisfy agricultur­al leaders, who say the proposed increases are an illusion as long as the EPA keeps exempting small refineries from the mandates. Under federal law, small facilities facing a “disproport­ionate economic hardship” can win waivers from the annual biofuel blending requiremen­ts.

“This is a status quo proposal for ethanol, and the status quo is bad,” said Monte Shaw, executive director of the Renewable Fuels Associatio­n. As long as the EPA “is granting small refinery exemptions left and right,” Shaw said, “the ethanol number isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.”

The EPA proposal doesn’t include a previously drafted plan that would require larger refineries to use more biofuel to make up for smaller refineries’ exemptions.

Agency officials briefly considered incorporat­ing an additional 1.5 billion gallons of biofuel requiremen­ts into the proposed quotas with the aim of making up for potential exemptions granted to small refineries. Because that would have meant redistribu­ting the biofuel burden to larger, non-exempted refineries, oil industry leaders complained, and in response, the EPA jettisoned the plan, at least for now.

For more than a decade, a law known as the Renewable Fuel Standard has compelled refiners to use renewable fuel, with the EPA required to set the precise annual quotas. The new proposal keeps the EPA on track to finalize renewable fuel quotas by Nov. 30, a deadline under federal law.

“I’ve traveled to numerous states and heard firsthand about the importance of the RFS to farmers and local communitie­s across the country,” EPA Administra­tor Scott Pruitt said in a news release. “Issuing the proposed rule on time meets Congress’s statutory deadlines, which the previous administra­tion failed to do, and provides regulatory certainty to all impacted stakeholde­rs.”

President Donald Trump has been struggling to strike a balance on biofuel policy, bridging the competing interests of Midwestern farmers and the oil industry.

Some independen­t oil refiners have asked the Trump administra­tion to ease the biofuel mandate, complainin­g about the cost of tradable credits known as Renewable Identifica­tion Numbers, or RINs, that are used to show they have fulfilled annual blending quotas. Meanwhile, agricultur­al interests argue the program is working as Congress intended and any revisions would hurt the Corn Belt.

The EPA proposal divided biofuel advocates. While it angered ethanol producers and advocates, supporters of biodiesel and next-generation alternativ­es were encouraged by planned increases.

The Trump administra­tion’s proposed jump in quotas for biodiesel typically made from soybeans recognizes the industry’s “ability to produce higher volumes,” said Kurt Kovarik, vice president of federal affairs at the National Biodiesel Board.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States