Watchdog calls for strengthened EPA oversight of water programs

The Environmental Protection Agency must strengthen its oversight of state drinking water programs to avoid a repeat of what happened in Flint, Michigan, where a slow federal reaction meant residents were exposed to leadtainted water for far took long, an agency watchdog said in a report Thursday.

“While oversight authority is vital, its absence can contribute to a catastrophic situation,” EPA Inspector General Arthur Elkins said in releasing the findings, which found that “while Flint residents were being exposed to lead in drinking water, the federal response was delayed, in part, because the EPA did not establish clear roles and responsibilities, risk assessment procedures, effective communication and proactive oversight tools.”

The EPA was not alone in its failure to address the crisis that crippled a city of nearly 100,000 residents, including exposing thousands of young children to lead. In particular, state officials failed to implement proper treat- ments after Flint switched drinking water sources in early 2014, and for months ignored warnings from local residents about the deteriorating water quality.

But the EPA’s inspector general found that federal government deserved significant blame for not more quickly using its enforcement authority to make sure that state and local officials were complying with the Safe Drinking Water Act, as well as with federal rules that mandate testing for lead.

For decades, Flint paid Detroit to have its water piped in from Lake Huron, with anti-corrosion chemicals added along the way. But in early 2014, with the city under the control of a state-appointed emergency manager, officials switched to Flint River water in an illfated effort to save money.

The crisis affected residents’ trust in government. For more than a year, residents and local activists complained of problems with the water, insisting it was causing rashes and other health problems. An EPA employee also warned superiors of potential contamination.

But those red flags were largely ignored. Only later, after a local pediatrician in late 2015 detailed skyrocketing blood lead levels in some local children and reporters began to publicize the problems with the water, did governments begin to move quickly.

The EPA eventually used its emergenc y powers to demand action.

THE NEW YORK TIMES For more than a year, Flint residents and local activists complained of problems with the water, insisting it was causing health problems.