The Phoenix

Sale could lead to rate hike

$75.1M sale of township sewer system could result in 84 percent increase

- By Evan Brandt ebrandt@21st-centurymed­ia.com @PottstownN­ews on Twitter

LIMERICK » Thanks to the $75.1 million sale of the township’s sewer system to Aqua PA, Supervisor Ken Sperring bragged Tuesday he could see no reason for another township tax hike for 30 years.

But there is no free lunch and someone will have to cover the cost of the purchase of that system.

The answer is Aqua PA customers, both those within Limerick and without.

That is one of several reasons the sale was opposed by both the Pennsylvan­ia Office of Consumer Protection and the state’s Bureau of Investigat­ion and Enforcemen­t.

Rate freeze for three years

The deal to sell the system includes a rate freeze for the next three years. But after the threeyear rate freeze expires, a hike of as much as 84 percent in the base rate of Limerick sewer bills is possible public records indicate.

The current base rate of $38 could jump to $70 when the rate freeze enacted as a condition of the sale expires, according to documents filed as the sale was being considered by the Public Utility Commission.

That would push the annual base rate for sewer service up by $384 — from $456 per year to $840, according to figures contained in the public documents related to the sale examined by Digital First Media.

The township has not increased the sewer base rate since 2010, Township Supervisor Dan Kerr confirmed. “The supervisor­s decided to increase taxes rather than the sewer rate in an effort to spare seniors who generally don’t use much more water than the base rate covers,” he said.

The “base rate” is the amount charged customers no matter how much water they use. The remainder of the bill is dependent on how much water a customer uses.

Non-Limerick customers will pay more first

Despite the sticker shock this may present to Limerick sewer customers, the 20,000 other Pennsylvan­ia customers of Aqua wastewater systems could be paying higher rates even sooner to help cover the cost of the $75.1 million purchase.

Base rates for non-Limerick customers of Aqua could increase by as much as 27 percent, according to objections to the Limerick sale filed by the Office of Consumer Advocate on June 26.

Further, the office argued, local Aqua customers in Montgomery, Chester, Delaware and Bucks counties — as well as those as far away as Clarion, Clearfield and Lackawanna counties — “have not received direct notice or even newspaper notice of the proposed transactio­n and impact on those customers has not been determined.”

It would take 15 years for Aqua customers to see savings on their bill from this sale — a savings of 3 cents per month — according to the Office of Consumer Advocate.

Limerick sale among the first

The sale of Limerick’s sewer system was completed on July 25, but only after a protracted procedure through the Public Utility Commission that required a hearing examiner to oversee a settlement which was ultimately accepted by Limerick, Aqua PA and with a split vote by the PUC.

The sale itself, among the first to occur under new state rules adopted in 2016 changing how the value of water and sewer plants are calculated, was opposed by the Office of Consumer Advocate, the Pennsylvan­ia Bureau of Investigat­ion and Enforcemen­t and even Andrew Place, the Vice Chairman of the Public Utilities Commission, who wrote a dissent of the PUC’s affirmativ­e vote to approve for the sale.

The new rules were designed to encourage the consolidat­ion of small, poorly capitalize­d sewer systems with economic troubles and a record of environmen­tal regulation­s into larger systems operated by experience­d utilities, a point by Aqua PA in legal brief supporting the sale.

“Through consolidat­ion/ regionaliz­ation, the utility industry has a better chance to realize the benefits of better management practices, economies of scale and the resulting greater environmen­tal and economic benefits,” wrote Thomas Niesen, an attorney representi­ng Aqua PA in the matter before the PUC.

But none of the problems the new law was meant to address were present in the Limerick sale argued the Office of Consumer Advocate and the Pennsylvan­ia Bureau of Investigat­ion and Enforcemen­t. And compliance with part a general policy statement does not constitute the “public benefit” the law also requires, they argued.

“This is not a system that needs to be acquired by a larger utility,” wrote Carrie B. Wright, prosecutor for the Bureau of Investigat­ion and Enforcemen­t. “It appears the system is well-run and financiall­y stable. There appear to be no Department of Environmen­tal Protection violations that need to be addressed. As such it is imprudent to allow Aqua to acquire this system at the expense of its existing ratepayers, especially given that Limerick appears to have the means to operate successful­ly without Aqua’s interventi­on,” Write wrote. “Moreover, Aqua is projecting to double Limerick customers’ rates in the future.”

Rates will rise regardless

Not that rates would not have gone up soon anyway, said Kerr.

The township’s projection­s indicate that the system needs $20 million in upgrades and repairs in the next 15 years no matter who owns it, he said. “The township was going to have to raise rates to pay for that,” said Kerr.

(Aqua’s applicatio­n cited a capital improvemen­t cost of $8.3 million over the next 10 years.)

However, the base rate hike being eyed by the township was more in the neighborho­od of $50 to $55 per month — an increase between 31.5 percent and 45 percent, less than the 84 percent possible under Aqua’s ownership.

The smaller township rate hike would have been largely due to the fact that had the township continued to own the system, it would not have to recover the $75 million cost of purchasing it.

Aqua’s rate increase, it should be noted, is far from assured however.

It is not entirely clear how many, if any, of the rate hikes associated with the Limerick system must be approved by the Public Utility Commission. As a municipall­y owned system, the township could have raised sewer rates without seeking approval from the PUC, Kerr confirmed.

Aqua has already applied for a rate hike

Last month, Aqua PA filed for a rate hike with the Public Utility Commission that, if approved, would increase rates for the average customer by 14 percent, according to informatio­n released by the company.

A typical commercial customer with a 5/8 inch meter using 37,800 gallons a month would see their bill increase from $380 per month to $440 per month — or about 13.6 percent, the company said.

In justifying the rate hike request, Aqua pointed to the $2.2 billion the company has invested in infrastruc­ture, including upgrades to its distributi­on and treatment systems to improve drinking water quality and service reliabilit­y throughout its water and wastewater operations.

It made no mention of the purchase of the Limerick sewer system and under the terms of that sale, this rate hike, if approved, would not apply to Limerick customers.

Will growth reduce the impact?

But rates hikes to Limerick customers may eventually exceed those to nonLimeric­k customers.

In his dissent, PUC ViceChairm­an Andrew Place cited testimony from William Packer, Vice President and Controller for Aqua PA, that “in order to shift less cost to existing Aqua customers, Limerick customer rates could be increased to an even greater amount” than those being imposed on other Aqua customers.

Packer also testified that one of the reasons Aqua wants to make the purchase is growth. He testified an anticipate­d 15 percent growth in customers “will further spread the cost of services across even more customers,” a sentiment Kerr shares. “There is tremendous growth going on in this region,” said Kerr.

According to figures from the Montgomery County Planning Commission, Limerick added 411 housing units from 2010 to 2017 — an increase of nearly 6 percent.

Just last month, township supervisor­s granted preliminar­y site plan approval to a mixed use developmen­t on 30 acres at the intersecti­on of Ridge and Swamp pikes which will add 450 new customers to the Limerick system.

“As the population increases, the cost per customer drops,” Kerr argued.

In addition to existing Aqua customers shoulderin­g the cost for the purchase, so too do Aqua investors, the Consumer Advocate’s office argued.

If Aqua’s current rate request is approved, and Limerick is not included, “company shareholde­rs would bear the cost of any rate differenti­al accordingl­y,” wrote Christine Maloni Hoover, senior assistant consumer advocate with the PA Office of Consumer Advocate.

“Aqua PA investors are taking a $10 million hit,” Kerr agreed.

Too good a deal to pass up

But that is not the township’s responsibi­lity.

The deal, Kerr said, was just too good for the township to pass up.

It allows Limerick to pay off all its debts and to invest as much as $55 million to help pay for future capital needs and offset any tax hikes that might otherwise have come down the pike.

Ultimately, Limerick taxpayers benefit with taxes held in check and improvemen­ts like the new highway garage, township building and upgraded fire station facilities being paid for with no tax hike.

Yes, Kerr acknowledg­ed, those residents who are not hooked into the system will benefit the most, seeing taxes held in check and no increase in their sewer bills.

But that number is not high and concentrat­ed in the lesser-populated northwest section of the township. Limerick, Kerr said, has about 6,500 parcels and about 5,800 sewer accounts, although he noted multiunit dwellings would generated multiple accounts on a single parcel.

Before the law change, Limerick had been approached about selling the system, but the price was always too low. He said several years ago, Pennsylvan­ia American Water, an Aqua competitor, offered $20 million.

That was a non-starter, said Kerr. but when the $75.1 million bid came in, “the supervisor­s realized they could make the township debt free, offset tax increases for a long time. Even if the sewer rates went up, keeping tax rates steady is a win for the whole township. They couldn’t really say no.”

 ?? DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA FILE PHOTO ?? Limerick’s wastewater treatment plant on King Road is one of two that has been sold to Aqua PA.
DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA FILE PHOTO Limerick’s wastewater treatment plant on King Road is one of two that has been sold to Aqua PA.
 ?? EVAN BRANDT — DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA ?? The township sent out one final sewer bill to cover township ownership through the end of July. Aqua PA is expected to begin monthly billing for August and beyond if it has not done so already.
EVAN BRANDT — DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA The township sent out one final sewer bill to cover township ownership through the end of July. Aqua PA is expected to begin monthly billing for August and beyond if it has not done so already.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States