The Providence Journal

Sister insists on secrecy about child from teenage pregnancy

- | CAROLYN HAX Email Hax at tellme@washpost.com.

Hi, Carolyn: In the mid-1980s, when I was 17, my 15-year-old sister became pregnant. She went away to a Catholic facility for a few months and had a healthy baby girl, who was adopted at a few days old. It was a traumatic time in our family. I was not really “in the loop” on the details of the pregnancy or adoption decision, and it was one of those things never discussed in our family. In addition, our father was sick and died a few months later. It was a tough time for everyone.

Last year, I received a DNA test kit as a gift. I sent it in and immediatel­y matched with the adopted girl, now a grown woman living near me with three kids of her own. Her profile stated clearly she is looking for any informatio­n about her birth parent and family. I immediatel­y turned off the matching option on the site, so I don’t think this woman saw we matched. I contacted my sister, whose husband knows she had the baby but whose college-age children do not. My sister was upset about the whole thing. She told me there was lots of shame surroundin­g it and she doesn’t want to contact this woman, saying it would upset our mother, who wanted no one to ever know this happened. My sister has been reluctant to discuss it further, and hasn’t even shared with her husband that I made this DNA match. I hope my sister warms to having contact with this woman. Clearly, the adopted woman wants it, and I think there is a lot of pain my sister has been carrying around. I also think it could help my mom resolve some pain as well. In addition, I think my sister’s kids may stumble upon the same connection I did and the whole thing could blow up. More selfishly, I would like to meet this person and have my own daughter meet her and her family. So far, I’ve just checked in with my sister every few months. Am I doing the right thing by hanging back? – Uncertain Brother

Uncertain Brother: Yes, for now. It was and remains appropriat­e to give your sister time to adjust to the new realities of her situation. Compassion is the only fair response. But while the compassion can be eternal, her grace period can’t, for a couple of reasons. First, there’s the inevitabil­ity of discovery that you mention. Your sister is running out of time to be the source of this news to her other kids. If your sister really wants to pretend she’s still in control, then she might be too invested in that fiction to hear you. But please do phrase it bluntly: that it’s going to come out with or without her, or you, and you strongly advise her not to squander her significan­t “with” advantage. She has lost control of her secret, and time is not in her favor. The second reason will probably be less persuasive to her, but it’s the better one: It is not your sister’s prerogativ­e to deny this child her humanity. What your sister went through is her story, absolutely. But her secret is a human being. And people are not secrets that anyone gets to keep. No amount of shame and no claim to control allow her to deny someone’s existence. These are two independen­t points, the scientific phenomenon of accessible DNA testing and the moral hazard of hiding a person from her family. Speak to her of the stakes, frankly and with love. Let her know you will not participat­e indefinite­ly in the denial of this person her rightful connection­s. (And yours.) Give her a respectful amount of time with a firm end-by date.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States