The Punxsutawney Spirit

Impatient Democrats prepare to go-it-alone on infrastruc­ture

-

WASHINGTON (AP) — Patience running thin, Democratic leaders are laying the groundwork for a go-it-alone approach on President Joe Biden’s big jobs and families infrastruc­ture plans even as the White House continues negotiatin­g with Republican­s on a much more scaled-back $1 trillion proposal.

A top White House adviser assured House Democrats during a closeddoor session Tuesday that there would be a fresh assessment by next week on where talks stand with the Republican­s. But Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer announced he is moving ahead, huddling privately Wednesday with the Senate Budget Committee to prepare for July votes on a majority-rules approach as wary Democrats prepare to lift Biden’s $1.7 billion American Jobs Plan and $1.8 billion American Families Plan to passage.

Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi are trying to calm worries from anxious rank-andfile Democrats that Biden is leaving too much on the table in talks with Republican­s. Restless lawmakers want assurances that if they concede to a scaled-back bill with Republican­s, it won’t be the last word and the president’s push for investment­s in climate change strategies, child care centers and other Democratic priorities will proceed — with or without GOP votes.

“We’ll see where we’re going to go after a week or 10 days (of) more dialogue and negotiatio­n,” White House counselor Steve Ricchetti said Tuesday, according to a partial transcript of the private caucus meeting obtained by The Associated Press.

The updated timeline comes as Biden’s top legislativ­e priority is teetering in Congress while he is overseas. The president and the Democratic leaders of the House and Senate have been engaged in a two-track strategy — reaching for a bipartisan deal with Republican­s but also setting the stage for a potential majority-rules strategy in case talks fail.

Over the past week, a bipartisan group of 10 senators has narrowed in on a nearly $1 trillion deal of mainly road, highway and other traditiona­l infrastruc­ture projects, but without the family-related investment­s in child care centers and other facilities that Ricchetti insisted Tuesday remains a top priority for the administra­tion. Republican­s reject those investment­s as costly and unnecessar­y.

“Just ask a working mom if child care is part of her family’s infrastruc­ture,” said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich. “Ask a family with an aging parent who needs help to live at home safely if home care is infrastruc­ture. We understand that it is.”

On Tuesday, the members of the bipartisan group of senators presented the emerging proposal to their colleagues at closed-door Senate lunches and were met with mixed reviews.

The effort by the bipartisan group, five Democrats and five Republican­s, has come far in meeting Biden’s initial ideas, but the senators and the president remain wide apart over how to pay for the plan.

Republican­s have rejected the president’s proposal to raise the corporate tax rate, from 21 to 28 percent, to pay for infrastruc­ture investment­s, or to increase taxes on wealthy Americans.

Instead, under the bipartisan proposal, the projects would be funded by increasing the gas tax paid at the pump by linking it to inflation, tapping unspent COVID-19 relief funds and trying to recoup unpaid income taxes.

But the prospect of raising the gas tax is highly unpopular with some Democratic lawmakers, echoing Biden’s refusal to raise taxes on people earning less than $400,000 a year.

Sen. Ron Wyden, chair of the Senate Finance Committee, described it as “another hit on working people.”

“To me, their idea that they’re going to raise taxes on working people while letting multinatio­nal companies and the most wealthy Americans off the hook is a nonstarter,” Wyden said. “I mean, where is the fairness in that?”

Biden is also facing skepticism from Democrats who want to see robust investment­s in strategies to fight climate change — for electric vehicle charging stations, money to bolster communitie­s’ response to harsh weather conditions and funds for public transit that many rural state Republican­s oppose and that have been dramatical­ly reduced in the bipartisan plan.

“There has to be a guarantee, an absolute, unbreakabl­e guarantee, that climate is going to be at the center of any infrastruc­ture deal that we cut,” said Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass.

“We cannot let our planet down,” said Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore. “This has to be part of the deal.”

The White House plans to give the bipartisan infrastruc­ture negotiatio­ns another week to 10 days before assessing the next steps, but insisted there was no deadline to this latest round of talks.

Deputy press secretary Andrew Bates said that Ricchetti conveyed to the lawmakers that “we are certainly going to know where things stand on infrastruc­ture talks generally in the next week to 10 days, and that we can then take stock overall. But he did not set a deadline or cutoff.”

Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Ky., the House Budget Committee chair, said the plan is, if bipartisan talks falter, to move “full steam ahead” on considerin­g a package as soon as July under special reconcilia­tion rules that would enable majority passage without the need for Republican votes.

With the Senate narrowly split, 50-50, Democrats are skeptical at least 10 Republican­s will join to reach the 60-vote threshold needed to advance most legislatio­n over a filibuster. Democrats are pushing to use budget reconcilia­tion rules that would allow passage on a simple majority vote of 51 votes in the Senate, with Vice President Kamala Harris able to serve as a tiebreaker.

The package being prepared by the House Budget Committee would include both the American Jobs Plan and the American Families Plan. These are Biden’s ambitious proposals to build not just roads and highways, but also the so-called human infrastruc­ture of child care, veterans care and education facilities.

Schumer will convene a meeting Wednesday of the Democratic senators on the Budget Committee, urging them to rally around a “Unity Budget,” according to a senior Democratic aide who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States