The Punxsutawney Spirit

Supreme Court rules for Sen. Cruz in campaign finance case

-

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court’s conservati­ve majority sided Monday with Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and struck down a provision of federal campaign finance law, a ruling that a dissenting justice said runs the risk of causing “further disrepute” to American politics.

The court, by a 6-3 vote, said the provision Cruz challenged limiting the repayment of personal loans from candidates to their campaigns violates the Constituti­on. The decision comes just as campaignin­g for the 2022 midterm elections is intensifyi­ng.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority that the provision “burdens core political speech without proper justificat­ion.”

The Biden administra­tion had defended it as an anti-corruption measure, but Roberts wrote the government had not been able to show that the provision “furthers a permissibl­e anticorrup­tion goal, rather than the impermissi­ble objective of simply limiting the amount of money in politics.”

Justice Elena Kagan disagreed, writing that for two decades the provision checked “crooked exchanges.” Kagan said in a dissent for herself and the court’s two other liberals that the majority, in striking down the provision, “greenlight­s all the sordid bargains Congress thought right to stop.” She said the decision “can only bring this country’s political system into further disrepute.”

In an emailed statement, Cruz’s attorney, Charles Cooper, said the ruling: “is a victory for the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech in the political process.”

The case involved a section of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, commonly referred to as the McCainFein­gold campaignfi­nance law. The provision said that if a candidate lends his or her campaign money before an election, the campaign cannot repay the candidate more than $250,000 using money raised after Election Day. The provision said loans could still be repaid with money raised before the election.

Cruz, who has served in the Senate since 2013 and ran unsuccessf­ully for president in 2016, loaned his campaign $260,000 the day before the 2018 general election for the purpose of challengin­g the law.

Cruz’s spokesman, Steve Guest, said in an emailed statement that the senator was “gratified” by the decision, which Guest said would “help invigorate our democratic process by making it easier for challenger­s to take on and defeat career politician­s.”

The decision is the latest since Roberts became chief justice in 2005 in which conservati­ves have struck down congressio­nally enacted limits on raising and spending money to influence elections. That includes the 2010 Citizens United decision, which opened the door to unlimited independen­t spending in federal elections.

Kagan, in her dissent, described one result now that the most recent provision has been struck down. A candidate could lend his or her campaign $500,000 and, after winning, use donor money to pay that back in full, she said. The grateful politician might then respond to donors’ money with “favorable legislatio­n, maybe prized appointmen­ts, maybe lucrative contracts,” she wrote. “The politician is happy; the donors are happy. The only loser is the public. It inevitably suffers from government corruption.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States