The Record (Troy, NY)

Get the latest thoughts from around the nation

- By Cathy McMorrisRo­dgers Rodgers, a Republican, represents Washington’s 5th District in the House and is the chair of the House Republican Conference.

Find out what columnists are saying today.

Hearing late-night host Jimmy Kimmel’s emotional monologue this week about his son’s condition and his family’s experience in the moments after his birth, I had a flashback to the day my son was born and we learned he had Down syndrome.

My husband and I had a lot of questions about Cole’s future. Whether he’d have health care shouldn’t have had to be one of them. When you’re facing years of doctor’s appointmen­ts, you want to know that having a preexistin­g condition,such as an extra 21st chromosome or a heart defect, won’t prevent you or your loved ones from accessing the care you need.

Protection­s for children such as Cole Rodgers and Billy Kimmel have long existed, as they should. And despite what people are saying, House Republican­s aren’t seeking to strip these protection­s - or anyone’s protection­s - away.

It’s the people we love - our children, friends and neighbors - who are the inspiratio­n behind our American Health Care Act, which we passed in the House on Thursday.

We’re working hard to build a health- care system that puts the American people back at the center of their health decisions. We’ve had conversati­ons - tough conversati­ons - with people from all walks of life, and we’ve passed a bill that we’re confident will improve lives.

When Obamacare was introduced, Republican­s and Democrats knew the status quo wasn’t working. But Republican­s rejected the notion that to help 2 million people with preexistin­g conditions get access to care, we needed a 2,000-page bill that transforme­d one- sixth of the economy.

At each point of our process to repeal Obamacare, we have not lost sight of our responsibi­lity to the most vulnerable in our communitie­s. Safety nets and protection­s are important and must be maintained for those who need them most. Our plan accomplish­es this mission in two key ways: by guaranteei­ng that access to health coverage can’t be denied for people with preexistin­g conditions, and by empowering states to innovate with new models for better patient outcomes at a lower cost.

This bill isn’t perfect. It doesn’t include every single component I wanted. But it came down to the AHCA or the continued disaster of Obamacare, which was an easy choice. The AHCA is a major improvemen­t, because a federal onesize-fits-all approach to health care isn’t the answer. Amajor feature of our plan is returning control to states, through both funding and reducing red tape, which empowers them to innovate and to stabilize costs.

With Obamacare, our healthinsu­rance system relies on younger, healthier people subsidizin­g the costs of the older and sicker. As a result, insurance costs consistent­ly increase to cover the costs of people who are considered “high-risk,” namely those who are sick or who have preexistin­g conditions. High-risk pools and reinsuranc­e programs at the state level address this concern and have been successful in the past. Our plan establishe­s a program to provide federal resources for states to create highrisk pools, reduce out- of-pocket costs or promote better access to services.

States know better than the federal government how to allo- cate and manage resources to address the needs of their people. Our plan allows states to serve and provide financial support directly to vulnerable population­s, including people with preexistin­g conditions. We’ve seen this system work before - just look at Maine. After the state created an “invisible” high-risk pool (“invisible” because it did not cordon off people with preexistin­g conditions from the traditiona­l market) and relaxed its premium rating rules in 2011, people with preexistin­g conditions continued to have access to health care and their premiums were cut in half. Young and healthy people could finally afford to enter the market, and prices stabilized even further. This approach was more personal, reasonable and innovative than anything a bureaucrat in Washington, D.C., could have imagined.

To me, protecting people with preexistin­g conditions isn’t just good policy - it’s a personal mission.

All across the country, families like mine have real concerns about the future of health care, and they are why we’re focusing on results and working on these reforms. Obamacare is wrong for America. It has failed, and it’s only getting worse - making health care more expensive and less accessible. To stand by and do nothing would be irresponsi­ble. The AHCA is a monumental step forward that trusts the American people - not the federal government - to make the best decisions for themselves and their families.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States