The Record (Troy, NY)

Toxic PCBs linger in schools; EPA, lawmakers fail to act

- ByTammyWeb­ber and Martha Irvine Associated Press

MONROE, WASH. » days of his inaugurati­on.

That was the final straw for Tom Simons, a former EPA regulator who worked for years on the rule and said getting rid of ballasts was the least the EPA could do to protect children.

“We thought it was a nobrainer: There are millions out there. These things are smoking and dripping, so let’s put this through,” said Simons, who retired shortly after Trump took office.

• • •

For decades, the presence of PCBs in schools flew under the radar.

States, cities and environmen­tal agencies focused on removing them from lakes, rivers and toxic waste sites because most exposure to PCBs is believed to come from people’s diet, including fish from contaminat­ed waterways, and because PCBs do not break down easily. Studies have linked them to increased long-term risk of cancer, immune and reproducti­ve system impairment and learning problems.

PCBs, or polychlori­nated biphenyls, are mixtures of compounds manufactur­ed by Monsanto Co. and widely used as coolants and lubricants in electrical equipment until they were banned in 1979.

By then they were in transforme­rs, air conditione­rs, adhesives, carbonless copy paper and billions of fluorescen­t light ballasts in schools, hospitals, homes, offices and commercial and industrial buildings. They also were ubiquitous in the environmen­t and building up in human bodies.

Nobody worried about schools.

Then a 2004 study by Harvard health professor Robert Herrick identified the widespread use of PCBs as a plasticize­r in caulk in schools built before 1980, estimating that as many as 14 million students and 26,000 schools could be affected. The EPAhad not been aware of its use in caulk before then, Simons said.

The EPA later found that the chemicals can move from building materials into the air and dust, where they can be inhaled or ingested. They also can be absorbed by walls and other surfaces as an ongoing source of exposure.

Regulators also discovered that old fluorescen­t light ballasts remained a potentiall­y widespread source of PCB contaminat­ion. The EPA had allowed the ballasts to remain in use because chemicals were in enclosed capacitors that experts thought would last only about 12 years. But it turns out they can last a half century or longer, said Simons.

The older they are, the more likely ballasts will leak, catch fire or smoke. And that has happened repeatedly in schools, office buildings, restaurant­s and factories in recent years, according to reports reviewed by the AP.

But the EPA has mostly voluntary guidelines, including recommende­d indoor air limits for PCBs that it says should protect children from health problems.

The agency does not require — or encourage — schools to test for PCBs, so few do. If they are found in materials such as caulk, schools could be forced to undertake expensive cleanups when many are struggling to keep basic infrastruc­ture intact and meet educationa­l needs. Drawing attention to the issue also risks alarming parents.

PCBs are illegal in building materials in concentrat­ions exceeding 50 parts per million — a threshold set by the EPA decades ago based on how much contaminat­ed material could affordably be removed rather than health risks.

Rather than fostering “a very confusing and fearful situation,” the EPA should recommend that schools test classroom air for PCBs, then identify and address specific sources if the results are elevated, said Keri Hornbuckle, a civil and environmen­tal engineerin­g professor at the University of Iowa and one of the nation’s top researcher­s of PCBs in schools.

“There is a good reason PCBs were banned, so ... let’s remove the worst cases and where (kids) are most vulnerable and have the highest exposure,” she said. “But you have to have the data.” • • • Whether PCBs are addressed often is determined by ZIP code.

In California’s wealthy Santa Monica- Malibu School District, parents, including model Cindy Crawford, sued to force the district to address PCBs after tests of caulk found levels up to 11,000 times the 50 ppm threshold. The district ultimately agreed to get rid of PCBs. It has torn down a middle school and continues to remove them from other buildings.

In Hartford, Connecticu­t, the ending was far different. John C. Clark Elementary and Middle School, in a largely low-income African American neighborho­od, was permanentl­y closed in 2015 after PCBs were found and the city could not afford to remove them. The city has sued Monsanto and a company that manufactur­ed caulk to recover the costs.

“It was the crown jewel of the neighborho­od,” Steven Harris, a former city council member and grandfathe­r, said as he walked the deserted school grounds. “Our school board is doing the best they can. The reality is we don’t have a lot of money. And it’s going to take money to fix this problem.”

Monsanto, now owned by Bayer Crop Sciences, has denied responsibi­lity in lawsuits involving several school districts, saying it did not manufactur­e the building materials or components that contained PCBs.

Concerns over schools like Hartford’s are one of the issues that ultimately kept the EPA from taking stronger steps to address PCBs.

The agency, which originally recommende­d that schools test for the chemicals, was warned by the Associatio­n of California School Administra­tors that forcing schools to remove PCBs could create “a civil rights issue” if low-income minority schools could not afford it. What’s more, many of those schools have other environmen­tal problems — including lead, asbestos and mold — that could be higher priorities.

So instead, the EPA developed guidance that promotes vigilant cleaning and better ventilatio­n and suggests schools could cover materials suspected of containing PCBs until the buildings are renovated or razed.

But the recommenda­tions were released quietly on the agency website to avoid publicity that might frighten the public, according to former EPA officials who said the agency was hamstrung by a problem that could cost billions of dollars. There are no rules requiring school officials to tell parents if they find or suspect their buildings have PCBs.

Judith Enck, administra­tor of the EPA’s Region 2 under Obama, said the EPA bowed to intense political pressure.

“The debate was never based on science and health. It was ‘ We don’t want the grief from schools, and it’s a lot of work and we have other priorities,’” said Enck, who led an effort to get ballasts out of New York City schools. “I disagreed.”

A bill introduced in 2010 by three New York congressme­n aimed at funding school PCB cleanups was withdrawn after New York City officials agreed to replace aging ballasts. Sen. EdMarkey of Massachuse­tts released a report outlining PCB risks in October 2016 — a month before Trump’s election — and said he would introduce legislatio­n to help with PCB cleanup and other school environmen­tal problems, but never did. His office did not respond to multiple AP interview requests.

It was clear that PCBs were so widespread that cleanup would overwhelm schools without a huge financial commitment from Congress, said Tom Huetteman, the former assistant director of the PCBs programat EPA Region 9, based in San Francisco.

But he said the EPA’s guidance outlined important steps schools could take to reduce exposure regardless of their finances.

“It would be great if there was zero exposure in schools, but that’s not the world we live in,” Huetteman said.

Current EPA officials said in written responses that the agency’s recommende­d precaution­s are usually effective, but the steps might not adequately reduce exposure in every school. It also said the agency is “actively identifyin­g” money for a program targeting school environmen­tal hazards.

• • •

The EPA decided that dealing with old PCB-containing light ballasts was easier and hurried to adopt the rule that would have required schools and daycares to remove them before Obama’s second term ended, only to fall short. It was killed as part of a wider regulatory rollback under Trump.

The agency had advised schools to get rid of ballasts in 2001 — two years after a ballast failure sparked a fire at a Southern California high school and improper cleanup of a ballast leak exposed people to PCBs at an Oregon school. The agency made the same recommenda­tion again in 2010, when it was clear ballasts remained a problem.

But the EPA in 2015 estimated that there still were 2.6 million PCB- containing ballasts in schools and a half-million in day cares, with up to 70 percent of them likely leaking. Almost 40 million more were in buildings such as hospitals, public housing and offices.

New York City public schools replaced hundreds of thousands of ballasts in almost 900 schools between 2013 and 2016, after being sued by parents who had become alarmed when failing ballasts were found throughout the district, even leaking oil onto a student.

In Los Angeles, officials last year finished removing 14,220 PCB-containing ballasts from about 750 schools, officials said.

Many school districts now have replaced fluorescen­t light ballasts through energy-savings partnershi­ps with utilities. And the Department of Energy phased out production of the light tubes used in the ballasts that used PCBs.

But a surprising number of suspect ballasts still are in use, especially in urban, rural and low-income districts with older buildings, and in the Midwest and South, experts said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States