The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Employers key to developing workplace harassment solutions

- By Robin Imbrogno and Thomas F. Curtin, Jr. Robin Imbrogno is president of Seymour-based The Human Resource Consulting Group, LLC, and Thomas F. Curtin, Jr. is corporate director for North Haven-based Ulbrich Stainless Steels & Special Metals, Inc.

The workplace is shifting, and it’s clear that what has been tolerated in the past will no longer be acceptable. That’s a good thing. Everyone deserves to work in an environmen­t where they feel safe, and employers must be part of the solution.

As it stands now, Connecticu­t is a leader in creating safe workplaces. Our sexual harassment prevention training laws are some of the most stringent in the nation, and we should all be proud of that.

Connecticu­t is one of just three states that require private sector employers to provide sexual harassment prevention training, mandating it for supervisor­s at companies with 50 or more employees.

Two legislativ­e proposals make dramatic changes to that requiremen­t.

Governor Malloy’s bill, HB 5043, now awaiting action in the state House, requires businesses with 15 or more employees to train all employees every five years, meaning about 1 million Connecticu­t workers will need training.

Senate Democrats crafted another bill, SB 132, that sets similar requiremen­ts but drops the threshold and mandates any business with three or more employees train all employees.

Training is expensive, with per-employee costs ranging from $100-$150. Complying with HB 5043 and SB 132 could cost Connecticu­t's private sector over $100 million in new training costs alone.

Costs and administra­tive burdens aside, a more troubling component of SB 132 is the removal of certain protection­s for companies that strive to create a safe, harassment-free work environmen­t.

Current state law provides affirmativ­e defenses for companies that have policies against sexual harassment, train their employees, properly investigat­e any claim of harassment, take immediate corrective action, and prevent retaliatio­n.

In other words, if an employee harasses a colleague and the company does all the right things — has a policy in place, investigat­es the claim, takes corrective action, and prevents retaliatio­n — the business faces no liability.

However, under SB 132, if another employee later does the same thing — even if the company takes all the right steps afterwards — the business is strictly liable if a judge or the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunit­ies decides that those two incidents comprise a pattern.

This creates a no-win situation for employers, especially those who go through incredible effort and expense to provide a safe workplace.

Everyone agrees that workplace harassment prevention is good policy. We need to strike a balance to make safe work environmen­ts an attainable goal for all employers. That means it is critical that lawmakers find the right solution in addressing issues currently making headlines around the country.

Lawmakers must also ensure any changes to current law do not bring severe and costly consequenc­es for businesses, particular­ly smaller employers.

We want all our colleagues to be protected from harmful and abusive environmen­ts.

We want to make changes now so no one will have to experience anything like others before them.

Sexual harassment is a serious problem, but the solutions outlined in current proposals are too vast and too expensive for Connecticu­t businesses, particular­ly small businesses.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States