The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Missing children: The Pottery Barn rule revisited

- By Thomas L. Knapp Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertaria­n Advocacy Journalism.

If one in five American parents couldn’t figure out where their kids were, most people would rightly see the phenomenon as a crisis and a national scandal. Grandstand­ing prosecutor­s with visions of gubernator­ial campaigns dancing in their heads would conduct mass parental perp walks. Legislator­s would boost their presidenti­al aspiration­s by co-sponsoring legislatio­n requiring universal implantati­on of GPS trackers at birth.

But when the same U.S. government that postures as a better parent than real parents, crows over “extreme vetting” of immigrants, and announces separation of undocument­ed families as policy, loses track of 19 percent of unaccompan­ied refugee children placed in homes by the Office of Refugee resettleme­nt, ORR is “not legally responsibl­e.” So says Steven Wagner, acting assistant secretary for the Administra­tion for Children and Families.

That’s par for the course when it comes to government and responsibi­lity.

For example, if I find myself in fear of a police officer and shoot him, you can bet your bottom dollar I’ll be held “legally responsibl­e.” But if that same police officer shoots me and then claims he was afraid because he thought my cell phone was a gun, the chances of any “legal responsibi­lity” attaching are slim. If he doesn’t just get a paid vacation (”administra­tive leave”) before being “cleared” as having “acted in accordance with department policy,” a court will likely find him not responsibl­e under the theory of sovereign immunity (the idea that when a government employee is on the job, no personal liability attaches to that employee’s actions).

Even when a government official does“accept responsibi­lity,” it usually reads as “OK, I’ve said I accept responsibi­lity, now let’s forget about it and move on as if nothing happened, and don’t you dare mention it next time I’m up for promotion or reelection.”

In 2002, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell allegedly invoked “the Pottery Barn rule” — “you break it, you bought it” — by way of trying to get President George W. Bush to rethink the ill-fated invasion of Iraq.

Pottery Barn actually has no such rule, but when I was a kid, a lot of stores sported signs saying exactly that.

Government doesn’t have such a rule either, but it should.

A government employee who loses track of 1,475 children placed in his charge needs to to be fired — at least. An investigat­ion of possible criminal negligence doesn’t seem unreasonab­le to me. Nor does a home visit by the area’s Department of Children’s Services or equivalent to make sure his or her own kids haven’t gone missing.

Even better, we could stop handing over so much power to government on the silly suppositio­n that government jobs magically make the people who hold them smarter, more competent, or more responsibl­e than us regular folks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States