The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Branches struggle to keep riders on time

- By Bill Cummings bcummings@ctpost.com

Metro-North Railroad is under fire for branch line performanc­e that has left some commuters with no more than a 64 percent chance of arriving at work on time.

The Waterbury Branch in July was on time 64 percent of the time, while the New Canaan Branch was on time 78 percent and the Danbury Branch 87 percent, a Hearst Connecticu­t Media review shows.

Riders on Shore Line East — a separate rail service that runs trains to New Haven from points northeast of the city and offers connection­s to Metro-North — have also suffered, with service that was punctual only 72 percent of the time in July.

“Performanc­e is affecting ridership,” said Jim Gildea, chairman of the Connecticu­t Commuter Railroad Council.

“When you have a 65 percent chance you will not get to work on time, that’s a problem,” said Gildea, who rides the Waterbury Branch. “We have never seen performanc­e this bad.”

Metro-North and state officials acknowledg­ed trains are late and attributed delays to ongoing upgrades of the system and equipment breakdowns.

“The recent trend of late trains on the New Haven Line, including the Waterbury, New Canaan and Danbury branches, has primarily been the result of extensive, ongoing upgrades to our infrastruc­ture,” Metro-North said in a statement.

In a recent letter to the state Department of Transporta­tion, 12 lawmakers — including state Rep. Themis Klarides, R-Derby and the House minority leader — demanded action and an explanatio­n.

“As you know on time performanc­e impacts ridership; when residents don’t feel like they can rely on rail, they will take their car into work — again clogging up Connecticu­t roadways,” the lawmakers told DOT Commission­er James Redeker.

“This is clearly shown with an almost 2 percent decrease in ridership when compared to earlier months,” the legislator­s noted. “This is unacceptab­le performanc­e.”

Redeker said commuters will have to live with the delays for now as workers toil to improve the railroad.

“The constructi­on activities that are taking place are necessary and long overdue,” Redeker said. “The service delays to accommodat­e this aggressive rebuilding program will ultimately lead to a more reliable, more comfortabl­e train service.”

Improvemen­t and delay

Gildea said the poor performanc­e could have been avoided, pointing out the state promised aggressive improvemen­ts to the Waterbury Branch three years ago.

Although the $2.8 million project was supposed to be finished this year, Gildea said DOT only recently approved money to design the work.

“They lack foresight and vision,” Gildea said of DOT. “There is not enough equipment for the branches, not enough diesels. They have not made the necessary infrastruc­ture investment­s they should make.”

Gildea added, “They will say Waterbury or Danbury has not lost that much (ridership), but it takes a few months for ridership to decline. There has been constructi­on and speed restrictio­ns for years now. It’s a smokescree­n masking a more serious issue.”

Judd Everhart, a DOT spokesman, said the reason for the spike in late trains is straightfo­rward.

“Two out of three late Waterbury Line trains are the result of a late train connection from the New Haven Line,” Everhart said.

“The performanc­e on the New Haven Line is the result of an aggressive capital investment program that has taken multiple tracks out of service throughout the 72 miles of railroad between Grand Central Terminal,” he noted.

Everhart said major projects include a track undercutti­ng program in Rye, N.Y., bridge work in Greenwich and Stamford, replacemen­t of boarding platforms at Noroton Heights and new railroad interlocki­ng in Norwalk.

“These projects are addressing decades of under investment, but have significan­t negative impacts on service,” Everhart said.

“We realize we could have done a better job at getting the word out about the constructi­on program and we are working with Metro-North on a special notice to customers to explain the recent performanc­e and what to expect ahead,” he added.

Metro-North said breakdowns on the branch lines has also impacted performanc­e, as well as constructi­on projects and implementa­tion of the Positive Train Control safety system.

“We have experience­d a decline in the performanc­e of our diesel locomotive­s operating on the Danbury and Waterbury branches.” Metro-North said. “To improve the performanc­e of our fleet, we are beginning a program to overhaul locomotive­s over the next four years.”

The railroad added “We appreciate your patience and understand­ing as we carry out these critical projects. Our track and infrastruc­ture work will not only make our system safer; it is also an investment in the future reliabilit­y of our system, which is something that you rightfully expect and deserve.”

 ?? Ned Gerard / Hearst Connecticu­t Media ?? The Waterbury line Metro-North train pulls through the Ansonia train station in July. Metro-North is under fire for a dismal performanc­e record at its branch lines that has left some commuters with no more than a 64 percent chance of arriving to work on time.
Ned Gerard / Hearst Connecticu­t Media The Waterbury line Metro-North train pulls through the Ansonia train station in July. Metro-North is under fire for a dismal performanc­e record at its branch lines that has left some commuters with no more than a 64 percent chance of arriving to work on time.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States