The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

State must not profiteer off prisoners’ phone calls

- Rep. Josh Elliott (D-Hamden), Rep. Joshua Hall (Hartford), Rep. Anne Hughes (D-Easton, Redding, Weston), Rep. Hilda Santiago (D-Meriden), Rep. Michael Winkler (D-Vernon), Rep. David Michel (D-Stamford)

Connecticu­t faces a moment of tremendous potential: The opportunit­y to lead the nation in reforms that will benefit communitie­s directly impacted by our nation’s love affair with incarcerat­ion.

Our legislatur­e is currently considerin­g a bill (HB 6714) that encourages communicat­ion between incarcerat­ed people in Connecticu­t and their families and support networks. Connecticu­t will be the first state to tackle the considerab­le financial burden placed on communitie­s — disproport­ionately communitie­s of color and poverty — fighting to maintain relationsh­ips with loved ones locked up inside prisons and jails.

While Connecticu­t touts its overall progressiv­e policies, we currently rank 49th in the country (second only to Arkansas) in affordabil­ity for a phone call from prison. A 15-minute call can runs nearly $5, not including the fees imposed for depositing money into prepaid accounts.

In fiscal year 2018, Connecticu­t residents paid $13.3 million (excluding deposit fees and taxes) for phone calls with their incarcerat­ed loved ones. Securus, a powerful prison telecommun­ications corporatio­n, recorded roughly $5.6 million of that as revenue and the state received $7.7 million in kickbacks on the exclusive contract. That’s right: We make money gouging the poorest and most vulnerable among us.

This legislativ­e session we were visited by criminal justice advocates who shared their stories.

A formerly incarcerat­ed Connecticu­t resident reflected on the monetary and psychologi­cal costs of phone calls inside: “When I was incarcerat­ed, regular communicat­ion with my loved ones was essential for me to maintain my physical, mental, spiritual and emotional health. All of those things suffered because I couldn’t manage to communicat­e with them … you worry that you’re being a burden. They’re out there trying to take care of their bills, and you become another bill by trying to keep in contact with them.”

Making communicat­ion more accessible is not just the right thing to do; it’s also the smart thing to do. Research has demonstrat­ed the importance of communicat­ion between incarcerat­ed people and their loved ones. Communicat­ion increases safety and hope within prisons and jails, and it decreases recidivism and improves re-entry outcomes upon release. In making calls free, we would not only keep Connecticu­t families together, but we would also lower incarcerat­ion rates (along with its costs) and improve public safety. It’s difficult to argue against such benefits.

Some lawmakers have voiced objections to the loss of revenue and the additional budget for these calls. Not only would the proposal save Connecticu­t money in the long run, but exploitati­on of vulnerable communitie­s is certainly not the answer. Core state functions should be funded out our core state budget, not by those who can least afford it — it is neither ethical nor sustainabl­e.

As a state, it is our moral obligation to find a way to step up and model what fairness and equity look like for the rest of the country.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States