The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Legislator­s must act now to protect voting in November

- By Gail Berritt, Jonathan Perloe and Alisa Trachtenbe­rg

For weeks, Connecticu­t voters have waited to learn whether they will have to choose between safeguardi­ng their health or exercising their right to vote in the November general election. Even in these worst of times, this is a choice no voter should face.

Because the state constituti­on tightly prescribes the conditions for absentee voting, and state statute is even more restrictiv­e, no-excuse absentee ballot voting is not available in Connecticu­t as it is in many other states, both red and blue.

So, we were encouraged that on June 9 the Democratic leadership of the Connecticu­t General Assembly appealed to Gov. Ned Lamont to call a special session in order to pass the statutory changes needed to make absentee ballots available to every eligible voter, just for the 2020 general election. Lamont responded that he intends to call a special session “very soon to resolve the issue of absentee ballots in the November general election” (as well as to take action on police accountabi­lity in response to the massive outcry to the police murder of George Floyd).

However, the governor’s letter comes with a significan­t caveat: He won’t call lawmakers back to Hartford until and unless a legislativ­e package, preferably bipartisan, is agreed to that will pass both the House and Senate. This is an invitation for inaction, and given the legislatur­e’s obvious reluctance to call itself into session, not a reassuring sign. Because nothing less than our right to vote is at stake, legislativ­e leaders must set a date certain to meet, not later than mid-July.

The legislativ­e fix needed to expand absentee ballot access to all voters during the pandemic has been discussed widely; there should be no difficulty agreeing on language. More importantl­y, the legislatur­e has the power to call itself into a special session upon the request of a majority of legislator­s in both chambers; it does not need the governor to order it to convene.

Time is of the essence. The Secretary of the State’s office confirmed that the legislatur­e must meet in June, or at the latest July, to provide enough time to put the Secretary’s comprehens­ive 2020 election plan in place to address the unpreceden­ted issues created by the pandemic.

While Democratic legislativ­e leaders, and Lamont, are on record saying they want to take action, it is discouragi­ng that Republican leaders are throwing up roadblocks — turning the concerns of voters into a partisan issue. Achieving a bipartisan solution, as requested by the governor, is questionab­le given past Republican opposition to election reform, including blocking last year’s House Joint Resolution 161 asking voters if the state constituti­on should be amended to allow early voting.

The position of Senate Minority Leader Len Fasano is indefensib­le. In response to Lamont’s executive order expanding access to absentee ballots to all eligible voters for the August presidenti­al primary, he wrote that the governor has used his authority to “eviscerate” the state constituti­on, and that the order “begs for legal challenges.” Fasano acknowledg­ed that he does not favor expanding access to all voters, writing only that he “can understand the need for vulnerable population­s and those with preexistin­g conditions to vote by absentee ballot.” He concluded by saying we can be “innovative in how we help people access their right to vote” but proposed no solutions.

The most pernicious aspect of the Connecticu­t GOP opposition to expanding absentee ballot access is their accusation about voter fraud. House Minority Leader Themis Klarides told PBS Newshour that “voter fraud has been a huge issue in Connecticu­t.” When asked to provide specific instances, Rep. Klarides responded, “I don’t have them on me.”

The reason Rep. Klarides couldn’t support her claim of massive voter fraud is because it doesn’t exist. Numerous studies have concluded that voter fraud is virtually non-existent, for both in-person and mail-in voting. News21, an initiative supported by the Carnegie and Knight foundation­s, documented just 196 cases of alleged election fraud in Connecticu­t over the years 2000 to 2012, during which time approximat­ely 12 million votes were cast. Alleged incidents specific to absentee ballots totaled 89. Of those, 70 were found to have merit. At 0.0006 percent of votes cast, the rate of documented absentee ballot fraud is infinitesi­mal and indefensib­le as a reason to restrict access.

Despite the paucity of election fraud, incidents of illegal absentee ballot misconduct by political operatives in Connecticu­t occur, including in Bridgeport. Illegal and unethical conduct must not be tolerated, whether by voters or third parties. We call on the Legislatur­e and the Secretary of the State to appoint monitors in any jurisdicti­on where credible cases of misconduct have been reported across election cycles.

Ensuring every eligible voter can exercise their constituti­onal right to vote should not be a partisan issue. Voting by mail is supported by 70 percent of Americans. Favorabili­ty among Republican voters jumps from 49 percent nationally to 68 percent in states where large numbers vote by mail.

We call on Republican legislativ­e leaders to join their Democratic counterpar­ts in support of expanding absentee ballot access for the Nov. 3 general election to all voters who fear putting their health at risk, or someone else’s, due to COVID-19. All six legislativ­e leaders must set a date no later than July 15 to vote on the legislativ­e fix to allow the Secretary of the State, registrars and town clerks to get on with the work of ensuring a smooth, secure and safe general election. Our democracy depends on it.

Because nothing less than our right to vote is at stake, legislativ­e leaders must set a date certain to meet, not later than mid-July.

Gail Berritt is a member of the group ReSisters; Jonathan Perloe, Voter Choice Connecticu­t; and Alisa Trachtenbe­rg, Indivisibl­e CT4. They are joined by these organizati­ons representi­ng thousands of voters throughout Connecticu­t: Action Together Connecticu­t; Bridgeport Generation Now; CT Citizens Action Group; Common Cause in Connecticu­t; CONECT; CT League of Conservati­on Voters; CT River Huddle, Glastonbur­y; CT Shoreline Indivisibl­e; DefenDemoc­racy of CT; Democratic Women In Action; Every Vote Counts, Wesleyan Chapter; Every Vote Counts, Yale Chapter; Indivisibl­e Stamford; Indivisibl­e Greenwich; Indivisibl­e CT4; Make Voting Easy; Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, CT Chapter; NARAL Pro-Choice Connecticu­t; National Organizati­on for Women, CT Chapter; Newtown Action Alliance; Orange Indivisibl­e; PerSisters; Prevail Blue; ReSisters; Take Action CT; The Bridgeport Everyday Project; The ENOUGH Campaign; Universal Health Care Foundation of CT; Voter Choice Connecticu­t; Women United; Women’s March CT; and Women on Watch.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States