The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

U.S manufactur­ers can compete if obstacles don’t get in their way

- By Jill Mayer Jill Mayer is CEO of Bead Industries, in Milford.

Raging inflation, the lingering effects of the pandemic and perhaps the most unsettled global political climate in decades all contribute to a challengin­g competitiv­e environmen­t for U.S. manufactur­ers. We need to do everything possible to minimize obstacles to their success, including ridding ourselves of destructiv­e policies that subject manufactur­ers to unnecessar­y patent disputes.

American manufactur­ers have been fighting an uphill battle against foreign competitor­s for years. From 2007 to 2019, U.S. real manufactur­ing value added dropped by 13 percent of GDP. In 2001, the U.S. held a $4.5 billion trade surplus in advanced technology products; in 2020, we ran up a $192 billion trade deficit in that important sector.

That’s not to say American manufactur­ers can’t compete. American workers are among the most talented and productive in the world. The U.S. also has an excellent network of suppliers to keep parts and raw materials coming in so finished products can flow out. But that hasn’t stopped us from losing ground to overseas manufactur­ers who once only dreamed of competing with American-made goods.

There are multiple reasons behind this decline. Labor costs are lower in many other countries, for instance. And of course the same inflationa­ry issues that are hitting consumers so hard hurt manufactur­ers too. But one obstacle to competitiv­eness is self-inflicted and needs to be addressed. Along with all their other problems, American manufactur­ing companies too often face time and resource-consuming patent litigation from shell companies commonly known as patent trolls.

Patent trolls, or non-practicing entities, take advantage of U.S. patent regulation­s to file flimsy patent infringeme­nt suits against legitimate companies. This is the NPE’s only line of business; they don’t make products or innovate the technologi­es their acquired patents involve. They are profession­al litigants who either pursue infringeme­nt claims in the federal courts or, increasing­ly, before the Internatio­nal Trade Commission in hopes of receiving undeserved royalty payments or forcing the targeted manufactur­ers into settling the suit, a frequent outcome due to the expense of litigating an infringeme­nt case. When they go the ITC route, the NPE’s desired outcome is an exclusion order banning imported products, which gives them a huge advantage in settlement negotiatio­ns.

Frivolous patent infringeme­nt claims cost manufactur­ers, and the U.S. economy, millions of dollars each year, and cases are on the rise. It’s become such a threat to U.S. competitiv­eness that Congress has proposed legislatio­n to strengthen protection­s written into law a decade ago that have lost their punch due to some counterpro­ductive policy decisions made by the ITC and courts.

The original law was the America Invents Act, which establishe­d a better way of handling infringeme­nt claims called inter partes review, or IPR. The IPR made it easier for companies to defend themselves without going to court and weed out the bad patents that NPEs so often use as basis for their suits. The current bipartisan legislatio­n is called the Restoring the America Invents Act, or RAIA. It would eliminate loopholes that have weakened the AIA and overturn court decisions that limited access to IPR.

Bead Industries strongly supports passage of the RAIA. Our Connecticu­t company has been involved in patent developmen­t and the manufactur­e of products using patents for over 100 years. Bead understand­s the value patent protection­s provide and the damage that is done when patents are misused by profit-seeking NPEs. Bead Electronic­s director of engineerin­g David Brenton, with over 40 years of manufactur­ing experience, shares the insiders perspectiv­e of the issue, “We constantly innovate to solve customer’s problems. Patents on our custom interconne­ct pins protect this innovation and ensure effective technology transfer and knowledge sharing.” We have joined with other manufactur­ers in the advocacy group US*MADE to urge members of the U.S. House and Senate to make the RAIA a high legislativ­e priority.

In spite of setbacks suffered over the last few decades, U.S. manufactur­ers and the industries that support them accounted for almost one-fourth of entire U.S. GDP in 2020, while directly creating above-average-wage jobs for 15.7 million American workers. We have to protect this crucial economic engine, and we at Bead hope our Connecticu­t U.S. Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy will take leadership roles in passing the RAIA. Give our manufactur­ers a chance to continue competing in the global marketplac­e.

U.S. manufactur­ers and the industries that support them accounted for almost one-fourth of entire U.S. GDP in 2020, while directly creating above-average-wage jobs for 15.7 million American workers.

 ?? Christian Abraham / Hearst Connecticu­t Media ?? Bead Industries CEO Jill Mayer on the company’s factory floor in Milford in 2016.
Christian Abraham / Hearst Connecticu­t Media Bead Industries CEO Jill Mayer on the company’s factory floor in Milford in 2016.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States