The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Aquarion wanted to raise state rates by 27 percent

Regulators have tentativel­y rejected that plan

- By Luther Turmelle

A tentative ruling issued Thursday by state utility regulators completely rejects a 27 percent rate increase over three years proposed by the Aquarion Water Co. and instead calls for a small reduction in existing customer rates.

Taren O’Connor, a spokeswoma­n for the Connecticu­t Public Utilities Regulatory Authority, said the draft decision “rejects in full the company’s three-year rate plan and would instead reduce current customer rates.” The tentative ruling comes after months of hearings conducted by PURA commission­ers. If the ruling is approved when the final decision in the case is issued on March 15, the average Aquarion customer would see their water bill decrease by 0.2 percent, according to calculatio­ns done by officials with the office of Connecticu­t Attorney General William Tong. The actual dollar amount that customers bill would decrease under the draft decision ranges from 77 cents to $1 per year, depending upon what part of Aquarion’s service territory a customer lives.

Peter Fazekas, an Aquarion spokesman, said PURA’s draft decision doesn’t adequately take into account the more than $740 million in investment­s in new infrastruc­ture and services the company has since in the last rate case in 2013.

“These investment­s are the critical infrastruc­ture that approximat­ely 725,000 customers rely on for clean water supply,” Fazekas said. “This draft decision raises significan­t questions and uncertaint­y as to our ability to continue these investment­s into the future. While we understand the drive to affordabil­ity, it can not come at the cost of lost investment that will ultimately harm customer interests.”

Ever since officials at Bridgeport-based Aquarion announced its intent last summer

to seek a rate increase, the plan drew the ire of a number public officials. Tong, who urged PURA in January to reject the request, calling the proposed increase “excessive and unwarrante­d” at the time.

Tong said Thursday that Connecticu­t consumers have borne the burden of rate increases for years now and called PURA’s ruling “a massive victory for Connecticu­t ratepayers.”

“When Aquarion first issued its plan, I knew Connecticu­t consumers – especially those on fixed or limited incomes – simply couldn’t be asked to shoulder yet another costly hit to their finances,” he said. “I thank PURA for rejecting Aquarion’s proposed hike and for protecting Connecticu­t families and consumers.”

Connecticu­t’s Consumer Counsel Claire Coleman called PURA draft decision “a major win for consumers.” Coleman’s office represents the interests of utility customers in rate cases.

“Aquarion’s rate increase request was excessive and rightly should not have been imposed on its customers,” she said. “It is rare to see a rate decrease in the utility sector, and we appreciate the Authority’s efforts to seek a historic outcome – one that understand­s that residents are still coping with post-pandemic uncertaint­y and an economy that is increasing the cost of consumer goods.”

Aquarion is owned by Eversource Energy, which acquired the company in 2017. Eversource Energy also operates the state’s largest electric distributi­on company and a natural gas utility.

The increase Aquarion requested is the first fullfledge­d rate case filed by the company since Eversource purchased the utility.

Aquarion serves customers in 56 Connecticu­t towns, primarily in Fairfield and Litchfield counties. The utility also has customers in five Massachuse­tts communitie­s and seven in New Hampshire.

 ?? Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo ?? Aquarion Water Company’s Easton Lake Reservoir Treatment Plant. Connecticu­t utility regulators on Thursday tentativel­y rejected the Bridgeport-based utility’s request for a 27 percent rate increase spread over three years.
Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo Aquarion Water Company’s Easton Lake Reservoir Treatment Plant. Connecticu­t utility regulators on Thursday tentativel­y rejected the Bridgeport-based utility’s request for a 27 percent rate increase spread over three years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States