The Reporter (Lansdale, PA)

Give Trump ultimatum on stonewalli­ng

- EJ Dionne Columnist

If you want to understand how fundamenta­lly President Trump and his Republican allies have damaged our capacity for self-government, look no further than the debate over whether he should be impeached.

In a more virtuous political world, a significan­t number of Republican­s would read Robert Mueller’s report and decide: Yes, these findings deserve thorough investigat­ion — if only to prevent a foreign power from interferin­g in our elections again. But Republican­s (with the honorable exception of Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan) are doing no such thing. So an entirely legitimate search for truth gets branded as a “partisan” exercise.

And in a functionin­g republic, Congress and the White House would be dealing with actual problems the country faces. The Trump presidency puts problem-solving on hold, except for dealing with the artificial crises he gins up. And Republican­s in the Senate have little on their agenda except railroadin­g through Trump’s judges and blocking more than 150 bills the Democratic House has sent their way.

This dysfunctio­n leads to the Impeach Now/Impeach Later/ Don’t Impeach debate that is driving Democrats crazy. And there are good moral arguments on each side.

The moral argument for impeachmen­t is compelling: If what Trump has done is not impeachabl­e, nothing is impeachabl­e. The evidence of potential obstructio­n of justice outlined in the Mueller report should be enough, but there is so much more: refusing to separate himself from conflicts of interest with his businesses; alleged campaign finance violations in connection with hush money payments; potential violations of the emoluments clause of the Constituti­on; lies, lies and more lies and — well, you can fill in the rest, because I don’t have room here.

But the moral case on the other side, rooted in a commitment to democracy, is also persuasive: The best path for the country in the long run is for Trump to face overwhelmi­ng repudiatio­n at the polls in November 2020. We will be so close to an election by the time impeachmen­t works itself through that Democrats would be accused, not entirely without reason, of trying to take out of the hands of the voters a decision that is rightly theirs to make.

This argument quickly raises political questions: Wouldn’t the impeachmen­t process itself, even without a conviction in the Senate, allow the House to lay out for voters just how egregious Trump’s behavior has been and thus increase the likelihood of his defeat? Wouldn’t it be an unequivoca­l statement that the president is not above the law? Might an impeachmen­t inquiry be the only way to guarantee that the courts force witnesses to appear and documents to be delivered?

Perhaps. But wouldn’t Trump, whose only interest is self-interest, find other ways to resist, to keep the distractin­g circus going, and continue to win support from supine Republican­s? And I don’t know about you, but I have little faith in how conservati­ve judges would rule on these matters even if an impeachmen­t inquiry were started.

By tearing each other up over the impeachmen­t question, Democrats only serve Trump’s interests by dividing and dispiritin­g the very people who most want him driven from office.

Personally, I continue to prefer a glorious election night in which Americans tell the world that we are not Trumpists and Trump is not us. The best way to get there is to focus public attention not on the impeachmen­t debate itself but on the horror of Trump’s actions — and on the Republican Party’s flight from problem-solving.

Thus, a modest proposal that is imperfect but may be the only practical way forward: Democrats should publicly time-limit their forbearanc­e. Give the Trump administra­tion a set amount of time — say, 60 days — to respond to subpoenas for witnesses and documents and end the blockade on testimony from current and former officials. Make clear that if the stonewalli­ng continues, an impeachmen­t inquiry will start.

In the end, there should be one overriding imperative: The Trump presidency must end, at the latest, on Jan. 20, 2021. Given the Republican­s’ complicity with Trump, it’s a near certainty that only the voters can make this happen.

All thinking about impeachmen­t must keep this goal in mind.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States