The Reporter (Lansdale, PA)

Biden’s surrender to pro-abortion radicals has damaged his 2020 prospects

- Marc A. Thiessen Columnist

For decades, Catholic Democratic politician­s have been justifying their pro-choice position by telling us that they were personally opposed to abortion but could not impose their religious view on others. For most, the argument was a fig leaf to justify their failure to protect innocent unborn life. But it appeared that Joe Biden really believed it. For more than 40 years, Biden supported the Hyde Amendment, which bars federal funding for abortions. In 1994, when a constituen­t wrote to Biden, urging him, “Please don’t force me to pay for abortions against my conscience,” Biden replied, “I agree with you.” He pointed out that he had voted no fewer than 50 times against federal funding of abortions, promising, “Those of us who are opposed to abortion should not be compelled to pay for them.” In his 2007 book “Promises to Keep,” Biden wrote, “I’ve stuck to my middle-of-theroad position on abortion for more than 30 years.”

But middle-of-the-road is no longer good enough in today’s Democratic Party. So when Biden recently reaffirmed his support for the Hyde Amendment, his opponents for the 2020 Democratic presidenti­al nomination pounced. “There is #NoMiddleGr­ound on women’s rights,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., tweeted. “Abortion is a constituti­onal right.” Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., chastised Biden, declaring “No woman’s access to reproducti­ve health care should be based on how much money she has. We must repeal the Hyde Amendment.” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and a number of other Democrats also piled on, as did Planned Parenthood, NARAL and Emily’s List.

As recently as last week, the former vice president was still standing firm. It appeared this might be his “Sister Souljah moment,” when he separated himself from the extremists in his party. This was both principled and good politics: Just 36% of Americans support federal funds to pay for abortion.

But then Biden gave in to the mob. He tried to justify his flipflop by declaring, “If I believe health care is a right, as I do, I can no longer support an amendment that makes that right dependent on someone’s ZIP code.”

Biden’s surrender to the proabortio­n radicals damaged his presidenti­al prospects. First, it made him seem weak and unprincipl­ed. Few pro-choice voters would have abandoned Biden because he opposed taxpayerfu­nded abortion; indeed, plenty of pro-choice voters agree with that position. But voters will abandon a politician who abandons his principles.

Second, it hurt Biden with the one group he claims he can win back for Democrats: workingcla­ss voters who cast their ballots twice for him and President Barack Obama, but switched to Donald Trump in 2016. These voters are socially conservati­ve. Abortion radicalism doesn’t appeal to them.

Third, Biden’s capitulati­on refocused the national spotlight on abortion extremism in the Democratic Party. After Alabama passed the most restrictiv­e abortion law in the country, Democrats thought they had the upper hand in painting Republican­s as abortion extremists. But now the focus is back on Democrats and their insistence on taxpayerfu­nded abortion-on-demand up to the moment of birth.

Democrats don’t seem to understand that most Americans — including many who identify as pro-choice — don’t see abortion as something to celebrate but as a necessary evil that should be allowed only in some limited circumstan­ces. A Marist-Knights of Columbus poll found that just 13% say abortion should be available at any time during a pregnancy, while 80% say it should be allowed only during the first trimester; in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother; or not allowed at all. And a new NPR-PBS NewsHour-Marist poll finds that a 38% plurality believes life begins at conception, while a 75% supermajor­ity says it begins at the point of viability at the very latest. A majority of Americans support restrictio­ns on abortion and oppose federal funding.

Sadly, Biden has aligned himself with the radical minority. He should be ashamed.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States