The Reporter (Lansdale, PA)

Contract amendments awarded for project

Gale objects, citing proposed tax hike

- By Rachel Ravina rravina@thereporte­ronline.com @rachelravi­na on Twitter

The proposed items related to the One Montgomery Plaza ReSkin Project totaled more than $2 million.

NORRISTOWN » Contract amendments for the One Montgomery Plaza ReSkin Project caused some disagreeme­nt recently among members of the Montgomery County Board of Commission­ers.

The proposed contract amendments for items related to the project totaled more than $2 million.

Elected officials first authorized $23,364,700 in contracts for services related to the reskin project in February 2018. The county’s assets and infrastruc­ture department requested 1,795,764 for “contracted services” be issued to the following firms:$2

• $1,130,174 to TN Ward Company, of Ardmore, for general contractin­g due to “changes in design, office revisions, emergency roof repairs, additional space fit outs, and additional material costs. The revised contract now stands at $21,282,474.00.

• $208,422 to Cooks Service Co. Inc., of Avondale, for HVAC services to cover “duct design modificati­ons, additional space fit outs, and office revisions.” The updated contract amounts to $1,490,822.00

• $155,059 to Stan-Roch Plumbing, of Zion Grove, Pa ., for plumbing and fire protection constructi­on for “office revisions, gas pipe re-working, additional space fit outs, and installati­on of rail guards for trench drains.” The revised contract is now valued at $380,059.

• $302,109 to Hobbs & Company, of Boothwyn, for electrical contractin­g. The “amendment provides for exterior lighting revisions, security cabling, additional space fit outs, and office revisions.” The contract revision now stands at $2,007,109.00.

Additional­ly, a $278,223 contract amendment with Skanska USA Building Inc., of Blue Bell, provides for “constructi­on management” services related to the ongoing project.

A $762,180 contract was first approved in February 2018 for “constructi­on manager services for the One Montgomery Plaza Facade project,” and later authorized another $960,112 for “additional time and services required to complete the project,” the contract states.

The county’s assets and infrastruc­ture department requested an additional $278,223 for “an extension of services through the full constructi­on of the project in April 2021, reflecting the extended duration of the ReSkin project,” the contract states. However, officials are “in [the] process of working through cost sharing agreements across all constructi­on contractor­s.”

The revised agreement now stands at $2,000,515, according to the contract.

Despite opposition from Commission­er Joe Gale, those amendments passed in a 2-1 roll call vote during the Nov. 19 meeting.

Gale asserted the price tag of the amendments and the project overall is far too high.

“So again an example [of] how our capital improvemen­t projects are entirely too expensive and this is why we are facing a tax increase,” Gale said.

It appeared that Gale was referencin­g the recently proposed 2021 budget, which included a 5 percent real estate tax increase.

Montgomery County Commission­ers’ Chairwoman Valerie Arkoosh called on Assets and Infrastruc­ture Department Director Thomas Bonner for clarificat­ion on the financial status of the project.

“Just to reiterate that project, the reskin project is still fully within budget?” Arkoosh asked.

“That’s correct,” Bonner said.

“And these, if not all of these changes, were somewhat anticipate­d in the original conception of the project?” Arkoosh asked.

“That’s correct,” Bonner replied.

Gale also took issue with two other big-ticket items.

A contract not set to exceed $869,200 with Skanska USA Building Inc., of Parsippany, N.J. for “constructi­on management services for buildings at the EOC center.”

A request for proposal was previously issued and viewed by 72 companies. Two submitted bids for the job.

“I believe a ware - house shouldn’t cost over $800,000, let alone just the constructi­on management portion of it, and the fact that it’s over $6 million is very hard to justify when asked by a constituen­t that is being hit with a tax increase,” Gale said.

Another was a $125,000 agreement with Mike Kobithen Roofing & Insulation, Inc., of Churchvill­e, Pa., to amend a previously approved contract for work to repair the roof of a maintenanc­e building in Worcester.

A $268,814.91 contract with the Bucks Countycomp­any was authorized in October 2019. However, an additional $125,000 was needed for “field condition changes necessitat­ing additional material replacemen­ts beyond what was anticipate­d in the design documents,” the contract states.

The revised agreement now stands at $393,814.91.

“I would have paid less for the building if I knew that the roof would cost nearly $400,000,” Gale said.

In other business, the county’s trio of elected officials endorsed several other six-figure contracts relating to the department­s of adult probation, controller and board of assessment.

A $546,312 agreement with Resources for Human Developmen­t Inc., of Philadelph­ia, covers consulting services for a previously solicited request, Court Ordered Drug and Alcohol Mental Health Evaluation­s and Treatment Services for use by Adult Probation and Children and Youth.

This action, which was for a two-year term with two optional annual renewal terms, according to the contract, provides for a renewal. The county’s adult probation department opted for “the first available contract renewal term for the 2021 term” for the Philadelph­ia-based firm.

A 10-year agreement not set to exceed $400,000 with Pension Technology Group, of Boston, provides for a “pension administra­tion system.” According to the contract, the services, which are priced at $40,000 per year, includes “implementa­tion, hosting and support.”

The county issued a request for proposal for the aforementi­oned item in which 11 companies accessed it and four firms entered a bid, according to the contract.

A $381,495 agreement with Tyler Technologi­es,

Inc., of Moraine, Ohio, covers the “continuati­on of service for the iasWorld Software maintenanc­e & hosting service.”

According to the contract, the firm provides for software maintenanc­e and hosting, and the agreement will be valid from Jan. 1, 2021 to Dec. 31, 2021.

A three-year agreement with Clifton, Larson, Allen LLP, of Minneapoli­s, Minn., not exceeding $354,376 covers “accounting services.” The county’s controller’s office released a request for proposals for the contract in which 17 companies where 17 firms viewed it and six companies submitted bids.

A $285,000 contract with Redwood Toxicology Laboratory, Inc., of Santa Rosa, Calif., provides for “toxicology services.” The agreement, which is expected to be valid from Jan. 1, 2021 to Dec. 31, 2021, requires $265,000 for adult probation and $20,000 for the department’s office of children and youth.

According to the contract, “in strict accordance with Act 31, 1971, which precludes the need for advertised bidding.” However, the county’s adult probation department “requested to use a Sourcewell cooperativ­e contract for toxicology testing services and supplies.”

The next Montgomery County Board of Commission­ers meeting is scheduled for 10 a.m. on Dec. 17.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States