The Reporter (Lansdale, PA)

New report on fracking begs response from Pa.

A newly released report is raising new concerns about the effects of hydraulic fracturing on public health and Gov. Tom Wolf should waste little time using the findings as a platform for further study and, if necessary, reform.

-

Researcher­s find chemicals in drinking water and air samples and in people’s bodies near fracking wells.

The two-year pilot study was conducted by Environmen­tal Health News and what it lacked in samples size it more than made up for in specificit­y. Researcher­s spent nine weeks collecting air, water and urine samples from five families in southweste­rn Pennsylvan­ia — three who live within two miles of active fracking operations and two who live more than five miles from the nearest well pad.

What they discovered was shocking.

“We found chemicals like benzene and butylcyclo­hexane in drinking water and air samples, and breakdown products for chemicals like ethylbenze­ne, styrene, and toluene in the bodies of children living near fracking wells at levels up to 91 times as high as the average American,” the researcher­s recounted. “The chemicals we found in the air and water — and inside of people’s bodies — are linked to a wide range of harmful health impacts, from skin and respirator­y irritation to organ damage and increased cancer risk.”

Multiply potentiall­y affected families by the 12,400 or so fracking wells estimated to be active in the state and the math becomes downright frightenin­g.

Of course, none of this should be surprising to state leaders. The state’s Office of Attorney General released a widerangin­g report just last summer that outlined extensive environmen­tal, public health and oversight problems related to the fracking industry. The state department­s of Environmen­tal Protection and Health both came in for criticism for failing to protect Pennsylvan­ia’s citizens, often by embracing policies that placed profits above public health.

“When it comes to fracking, Pennsylvan­ia failed,” state Attorney General Josh Shapiro said in unveiling the report. The EHN report adds yet another big, red “F” to the state’s hydrofrack­ing report card.

It has also added urgency to stage lawmakers’ insistence that Pennsylvan­ia respond. Nearly three dozen state senators and representa­tives have written to Wolf, urging his “immediate action in response to the ongoing harm to the public’s health and well-being due to hydraulic fracturing.”

Ongoing, indeed. As the lawmakers — all, like Wolf, Democrats — point out elsewhere in their letter, “This study adds to an ever-growing mountain of evidence … that demonstrat­e a connection between a person’s proximity to shale gas developmen­t and a host of negative human health conditions, significan­t ecological impacts, and dire economic projection­s for the affected individual­s.”

There’s no argument here. Wolf acknowledg­ed this reality just last month when he joined fellow members of the Delaware River Basin Commission in voting to ban hydrofrack­ing throughout the 13,500-mile watershed.

Focus is now needed specifical­ly in the state. The EHN pilot study findings are concerning, but are they representa­tive? In writing to Wolf, the 35 state lawmakers urged replicatin­g the EHN research on a broader scale.

The effects of fracking are already widely known — from the financial and job-creation benefits on the “credits” side of the ledger to the environmen­tal degradatio­n in the “debits” column. Granular informatio­n on specific health impacts will no doubt add to the latter. There is no point, however, in waiting another two years to gather that informatio­n before acting to mitigate the effects.

By all means, conduct expanded studies, but there is sufficient informatio­n on the public-health costs of hydrofrack­ing — the 2020 attorney general’s report, for starters — to require the governor to respond to the question with which his colleagues ended their letter: “Does this administra­tion honestly believe that fracking is safe for our families?”

If the answer is “no,” urgent action on new safety measures must follow. — York Dispatch The Associated Press

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States