The Reporter (Lansdale, PA)

U.S. agency should put owl plan on hold

There is something shocking about trying to save one species by killing nearly half a million of another species.

-

That’s what the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed in a plan to save the spotted owls of the Northwest States from extinction by shooting hundreds of thousands of barred owls over three decades.

There’s no question the number of spotted owls is dwindling precipitou­sly as barred owls have muscled into their territory in Washington, Oregon and California over the last 50 years.

This situation has put animal welfare and conservati­on groups at odds with each other. In a letter to Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland sent on behalf of 75 animal welfare and wildlife advocacy groups, Animal Wellness Action President Wayne Pacelle and Scott Edwards, general counsel for the Center for a Humane Economy, called the plan “a colossally reckless action” that would doom the government to perpetual killing to keep the number of barred owls down.

On the other side, Kieran Suckling, executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity — which has long fought to save the spotted owl — supports the plan. Without it, he says, the northern spotted owl in Oregon and Washington will go extinct and the California spotted owl will become endangered. “Nobody wants to see an owl killed, including ourselves,” he said.

Shooting any owl seems like a horrible idea, and the Fish and Wildlife Service should put this fraught plan on hold and look for other options. We know the government biologists didn’t come to the plan lightly or quickly. The service has spent years testing its plan by killing a few thousand barred owls in smaller areas to see if spotted owl population­s stayed stable. It did. But this is a far bigger plan covering far more territory.

Spotted owls, native to the area, are smaller and breed less often. Picky about where they nest and what they eat, they favor particular­ly cool and dark cozy cavities of oldgrowth trees, the supply of which has been dramatical­ly reduced from decades of logging.

Barred owls are somewhat bigger, more aggressive and not above taking a spotting owl’s locale and food supply. They have been known to kill spotted owls — as well as mate with them, producing what some biologists have nicknamed “sparred owls.” The Fish and Wildlife Service calls them hybrids and says they should be shot as well.

Yes, barred owls are technicall­y invasive. But no one brought them here as pets or imported them for food or entertainm­ent. The barred owls spent the last century expanding their range and have been in the Pacific Northwest since the 1970s. They came here because they could.

This predicamen­t is a result of an ecological horror show — huge amounts of oldgrowth trees cut down, the increasing frequency and severity of wildfires and the fact that few scientists realized that barred owls were moving into this area until it was too late to do something less drastic to stop them.

Fish and Wildlife officials should give some other ideas a look. Instead of shooting birds dead, perhaps consider stopping them from reproducin­g. The agency says it looked at that and several other methods to control reproducti­on but they took too long to reduce barred owl population­s or were too difficult and expensive to carry out.

It’s illegal to hunt either of these birds, but the Fish and Wildlife Service can get a permit to allow the killing of animals in order to protect a species listed under the Endangered Species Act. It’s not that the agency hasn’t laid out a meticulous protocol for killing. The issue is whether they should be killed at all.

The plan has never been to eradicate all barred owls — you can’t — but to lessen their numbers enough to give spotted owls some breathing room in the forest. But that could still mean a perpetual killing program.

Maybe the government should consider letting nature take its course and leaving it to the owls. That’s ecological heresy to many conservati­onists. But it’s worth taking another look at whether this is a case where conservati­on of one species warrants killing another.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States