The Reporter (Vacaville)

State bill penalizing oil profits stalled

- By Adam Beam

After gas prices in California spiked to more than $6.40 per gallon last summer, Gov. Gavin Newsom led a charge against an industry he says is “ripping you off.”

Months later, it's not clear if California's Legislatur­e is following him.

Newsom, a Democrat, called lawmakers into a rare special session in December to pass what would be the nation's first penalty on excessive oil company profits. But the bill is still sitting in the Democratic-controlled Legislatur­e three months later, with no details on how much the penalty would be or when oil companies would have to pay it.

The oil industry spent about $34 million lobbying the Legislatur­e in the last two-year session and remains a powerful political force, particular­ly among Democrats who represent parts of the state where the industry provides jobs. The proposal would need support from a majority of lawmakers to pass.

The bill is a big risk for Newsom, who was just reelected in November and is seen as a possible presidenti­al candidate ahead of 2024. Newsom has embraced electric cars, ordering state regulators to ban the sale of most new gaspowered cars by 2035. But for decades gasoline is likely to continue to be a critical commodity in California, a state that has twice as many licensed drivers as any other state.

Historical­ly, California's gas prices have always been higher than the rest of the country because of the state's higher taxes and fees, and the special blend that gasoline regulators require because it is better for the environmen­t.

But state regulators say they can't explain recent price spikes like the one last summer that, at its peak, had some California commuters paying as much as $8 per gallon while oil companies recorded super-sized profits. Newsom's solution is to penalize oil companies when their profits get too high, and return that money to the public.

During the bill's first public hearing Wednesday in the state Senate, many Democrats were sympatheti­c to drivers hit by price spikes. But several Democrats appeared skeptical.

“What the hell are the possible unintended consequenc­es that could hurt those very people to a greater extent?” asked state Sen. Bill Dodd, a Democrat from Napa.

Dodd wanted to know what would stop oil refiners from simply shipping their product to other states in order to avoid California profits that could trigger a penalty.

Nicolas Maduros, director of the California Department of Tax and Fee Administra­tion, said years of data show California is one of the most profitable markets for these oil companies, meaning it wouldn't make sense for them to stop selling gasoline there. Plus, he said the Newsom administra­tion hopes the penalty would never be needed.

“This isn't a tax. It's not meant to raise revenue. It's meant to change behavior,” Maduros said.

Newsom said the reason it's taking so long to advance the bill is a “lack of transparen­cy” from the big five oil refiners, which supply nearly all of California's gasoline. Valero, Phillips 66, PBF Energy, Marathon and Chevron — have declined to testify during public hearings.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States