The Review

Be respectful of one another in the workplace

With a rematch brewing between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, the 2024 race is shaping up to be among the most divisive elections ever.

-

The us-vs.-them rhetoric on both sides is disturbing. And given the shameful attack on the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters on Jan. 6, 2021, additional political violence is a chilling but real possibilit­y. It’s a minefield for employers and workers. The divisions evident in the electorate inevitably will show up in workplaces.

At Walgreens’ corporate annual meeting this year, a shareholde­r proposal called for special protection­s for politicall­y conservati­ve employees. The company argued its existing protection­s are sufficient, and the proposal went down.

Many companies are dealing with today’s partisan political divisions, and, despite the lopsided shareholde­r vote supporting the status quo, this year is unlikely to be business as usual. From the top down, it’s best for people to be cautious about flaunting their political conviction­s.

That gets harder when companies are dragged into political controvers­ies, as Walgreens and CVS did when they decided, to sell abortion pills in states where it’s legal to do so.

As much as companies would like to sidestep controvers­ies, today’s fevered discourse can make it impossible. High-profile examples such as Disney’s recently settled legal dispute with Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida hint at many less-visible controvers­ies at companies nationwide.

The Environmen­tal, Social and Governance programs common to Walgreens, CVS, Disney and many other leading companies have become targets of far-right attacks — especially Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiative­s facing new legal challenges.

On the left, activists have threatened to boycott companies they perceive as caving in to pressure from the right, as when California Gov. Gavin Newsom joined a chorus of Walgreens critics upset last year when the company said it would not sell abortion pills in states where they are prohibited by law.

For employees working under conditions that feel fraught, we humbly suggest restraint. Be circumspec­t about sharing political viewpoints at work. Save the MAGA hat and “Eat the Rich” attire for off-duty hours. Tread lightly. Be respectful.

We recognize this advice runs counter to a trendy philosophy of workplace behavior. For a decade now, employees at many companies have been encouraged to “bring their whole selves to work.” Especially for younger workers, the ability to express their authentic selves has become an important factor in job satisfacti­on.

Still, every worker should be aware that being personally outspoken can come with risks. Private employers have a lot of leeway in employment decisions. And unlike gender, race or other demographi­c characteri­stics, a particular political viewpoint is not a protected class under federal law — though political affiliatio­n can’t be used as a pretext for illegal employment discrimina­tion.

Some states and cities have more specific protection­s, as do many public employees and other union workers. California is notable for a state law protecting workers who express their political beliefs and engage in lawful political activities. Those protection­s may expand. Illinois lawmakers are considerin­g a union-backed bill that would prevent companies in the state from retaliatin­g against employees who skip workplace meetings about politics or religion.

But good luck enforcing those protection­s: If an office meeting veers into politics, would the government then intervene? That’s a nonstarter, in our view. For good reason, the law continues to favor the rights of private employers to make their own decisions about hiring, firing, promoting and disciplini­ng their workers.

In its response to the shareholde­r proposal asking it to make special provisions for its conservati­ve employees, Walgreens repeated its long-standing commitment to respecting diversity of expression and refusing to tolerate harassment or discrimina­tion. We agree with the company that no special provision was needed to expand on those and other state-of-theart policies that it has publicly championed.

At the same time, each of Walgreens’ roughly 330,000 employees need to use good judgment to do their jobs without prompting any mini-insurrecti­ons — and that goes for the rest of us too. This upcoming election will be tough, no matter how it turns out. Let’s meet it with some self-discipline and our best instincts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States