The Riverside Press-Enterprise

Twitter struggled to reveal U.S. influence campaign

When company rushed to undo network of accounts, the disclosure came slowly

- By Kate Conger and Sheera Frenkel The New York Times

In response to a 2017 request from the Pentagon, Twitter kept online a network of accounts that the U.S. military used to advance its interests in the Middle East, according to internal company emails that were made public Tuesday by The Intercept, a nonprofit publicatio­n.

A counterter­rorism division at Twitter knew about the arrangemen­t, but others did not, five people with knowledge of the matter said. When it became more widely known within the company, executives rushed to undo it. But they struggled with whether to publicly disclose the military-run Twitter accounts, the people said.

Some of the accounts were removed, but others remained online for years. Twitter eventually disclosed the U.S. influence campaign this year.

The situation was unusual because Twitter normally removes and publicly discloses influence campaigns conducted by government­s. Social media companies have taken a strong line against state-backed influence campaigns since the 2016 U.S. presidenti­al election, when Russia misused Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to influence American voters. But in this case, Twitter’s transparen­cy efforts moved slowly and the company showed deference to the U.S. government.

The internal documents published by The Intercept were provided by Twitter under its new owner, Elon Musk. Musk has made an archive of documents available to select journalist­s to scrutinize the decisions of the company’s previous leaders. He did not respond to a request from The New York Times for access to the files.

It is unclear if Twitter, under Musk, will continue revealing influence campaigns on its platform. The billionair­e has laid off many employees who worked to detect foreign influence on Twitter and has questioned the level of collaborat­ion between the government and the company under its previous management.

Musk did not respond to a request for comment. A spokespers­on for U.S. Central Command declined to comment on the matter.

The situation began in 2017 when an official working with U.S. Central Command requested that Twitter verify some of the military’s accounts, according to an internal company email.

The accounts had been flagged by a Twitter system used to automatica­lly detect terrorist content and were not easy to find in searches. The Pentagon asked Twitter to “whitelist” the accounts, which would prevent the automatic tools from flagging them and make them more broadly visible on the platform. Twitter’s counterter­rorism team complied, two people familiar with the matter said.

Twitter executives became aware of the situation when a member of the counterter­rorism unit asked the broader security team for help with automating the whitelisti­ng of the U.S. government accounts, three people with knowledge of the discussion­s said. Surprised by the request, the security team asked to review the accounts, the people said.

Twitter allows government­s to operate accounts on its platform so long as the accounts clearly state who is running them. Accounts that masquerade as civilians are forbidden. Some of the accounts in the Pentagon’s 2017 request were clearly labeled government-run, three people who participat­ed in discussion­s said, while others were not.

Twitter executives then removed some of the military accounts that were not clearly labeled, three people involved in the discussion­s said.

But while the company regularly disclosed other state-backed influence campaigns in transparen­cy reports, executives hesitated in this case, the people said. Some feared they could violate national security laws by speaking publicly about the takedown of the campaign, they said.

Years later, some Twitter executives said they had conversati­ons with the Defense Department about removing all of the accounts and disclosing them, according to emails published by The Intercept.

“I think having a deeper understand­ing of what is going on will help us make a better decision,” Jim Baker, a lawyer for Twitter at the time, wrote in a 2020 email. He added that the accounts might be relevant to a military operation that would be wound down and that “shutting them down all at once may compromise other operations.”

In August, Twitter announced that it had removed several accounts that promoted U.S. foreign policy interests abroad, the first time it had disclosed such a campaign. Accounts linked to the campaign were also removed from Facebook, Instagram and Whatsapp.

 ?? JASON HENRY — THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Recently released documents at Twitter reveal a working relationsh­ip between company officials and the U.S. military.
JASON HENRY — THE NEW YORK TIMES Recently released documents at Twitter reveal a working relationsh­ip between company officials and the U.S. military.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States