The Saratogian (Saratoga, NY)

Trump policies equate to racial purging

- Cynthia Tucker Email Cynthia Tucker at cynthia@cynthiatuc­ker.com.

President Donald J. Trump recently ended a long-standing program that had allowed several thousand Liberians to remain in the United States temporaril­y. They have one year to leave voluntaril­y or face deportatio­n.

Thousands of Liberians fled their war-torn country for the U.S. in the 1990s; they were given temporary legal status by then-President Bill Clinton, and it was extended by George W. Bush and Barack Obama. Many have been here for decades, raised children here, started businesses and bought homes.

The president’s revocation of Liberians’ temporary legal status mirrors his actions toward thousands of immigrants from El Salvador, Haiti, Sudan and Nicaragua; they were also given protected status in the U.S. because of dire conditions in their countries of origin but ordered to leave by the current president.

Trump is not ousting them because they are criminals or layabouts, leeching off the public treasury. He is pushing them out because they are immigrants of a darker hue, and he and his most loyal supporters don’t want them here.

In another move meant to discourage legal immigrants, the Trump administra­tion plans to change federal rules on government assistance, according to published reports. If the changes are adopted, a legal worker may be denied permanent residency if he uses any federal support program, including the popular Earned Income Tax Credit.

By now, it should be clear that the president isn’t merely making good on his pledge to rid the country of dope dealers, gangbanger­s and drunk drivers who crossed the border illegally. He and his closest allies hold a deepseated animosity even toward legal immigrants if they come from Africa or somewhere south of Florida.

American history is littered with tales of the discord that has followed waves of immigratio­n. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Irish laborers fleeing the potato famine were treated with disdain and stereotype­d as lazy, dirty and drunken. But their descendant­s were able to assimilate, eventually, because of their white skin. And U.S. immigratio­n policies continued to favor those emigres coming from the continent of Europe, especially its northern and western countries.

But in 1965, Edward Kennedy, a young U.S. senator from Massachuse­tts, pushed through a law that would soon change the complexion of the country -- quite literally. The Immigratio­n and Nationalit­y Act ended preference­s for northern and western Europeans and dramatical­ly reduced the limits that had been placed on immigratio­n from Asia and Africa. Largely as a result of immigratio­n, the U.S. is becoming browner; by 2040, according to demographi­c estimates, whites will no longer account for more than half the population.

That was bound to create anxiety in a substantia­l portion of the white population. The civil rights laws of the 1960s allowed black and brown Americans to vote, to attend neighborho­od public schools and to eat in public restaurant­s. But those laws didn’t end the political or cultural hegemony enjoyed by whites, who are accustomed to representi­ng the “real America” in movies, in magazines, in advertisem­ents and, perhaps most important, in the Oval Office.

The election of Barack Obama was a startling wake-up call for many of them, a harbinger of the demographi­c changes just over the horizon. Hollywood and Madison Avenue, too, are signaling the inevitable changes in the way the country sees itself as movies and TV commercial­s frequently feature multiracia­l casts.

Trump’s election was a backlash to all that, the last gasp of a dying order. While many political prognostic­ators continue to insist that The Donald’s victory was due mostly to his economic outreach to a financiall­y fragile white working class, political scientists have noted that many Trump supporters are on solid ground economical­ly. They just wish to turn back the clock.

Trump’s introducti­on to the political stage as birther-in-chief was a signal to them that he was on their side. So was his presidenti­al campaign, dismissive of Mexicans, disrespect­ful toward Muslims and patronizin­g toward black Americans. His base will remain loyal as long as he keeps up his hostility toward people of color.

Still, the tide has already turned; the nation’s face is already changing. Trump’s racist policies only serve to diminish us in the eyes of a multiracia­l world.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States