Trump to colleges: Let them speak up
President Donald Trump will sign an executive order on Thursday requiring U.S. colleges to certify that they protect free speech on their campuses or risk losing federal research funding, White House officials said.
Trump initially proposed the idea during a March 2 speech to conservative activists, highlighting the case of Hayden Williams, an activist who was punched in the face while recruiting for the group Turning Point USA at the University of California, Berkeley. At the time, Trump said that Williams “took a hard punch in the face for all of us.”
The order tells federal agencies to work with Office of Management and Budget to ensure that colleges receiving research grants “promote free inquiry, including through compliance with all applicable federal laws, regulations and policies.”
White House officials say it will apply to more than $35 billion in grants.
Public universities pursuing federal funding would have to certify that they comply with the First Amendment, which already applies to them. Private universities, which have more flexibility in limiting speech, would need to commit to their own institutional rules.
How the government will enforce the order and what type of violation could trigger a loss of funding are still unclear. White House officials declined to provide specific examples and said implementation details will be finalized in coming months. In the Feb. 19 case at Berkeley, neither Williams nor the man arrested for the attack was affiliated with the university.
Trump’s adds no new obligations for schools but attaches strings to rules they’re already told to uphold. Colleges already are required to certify that they meet certain conditions in order to receive federal grants, and free speech protection would simply be added to the list. Leaders of some colleges have said the order is unnecessary, and some fear it won’t be enforced evenhandedly.
Trump’s son Donald Trump Jr. on Twitter called it a “momentous day,” saying the order will “protect free speech rights for ALL students.” He gave credit to Turning Point USA and its founder, Charlie Kirk, adding that Kirk has “been pushing this since the first time I met him years ago.”
Kirk has been among a growing chorus of conservatives who say their voices are stifled on college campuses. The debate has flared following a string of highprofile cases in which protesters have shut down or heckled conservative speakers, including at UC Berkeley and at Middlebury College in Vermont.
The order drew praise from conservative groups including the Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian legal group that says it has encountered “massive free speech and other First Amendment violations” on campuses.
Still, some Republicans suggested Trump’s order isn’t the solution.
“I agree that colleges should punish hecklers who veto free speech, and stop coddling students to protect them from disagreeable points of view,” said Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., the top Republican on the Senate education committee. “But I don’t want to see Congress or the president or the department of anything creating speech codes to define what you can say on campus.”
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos in the past has been critical of government answers. In a speech in Philadelphia last September, DeVos said the remedy “is not accomplished with government muscle. A solution won’t come from defunding an institution of learning or merely getting the words of a campus policy exactly right.” Instead, she said the problem is “symptomatic of a civic sickness.”
Many colleges have opposed the order, saying they already have strong free speech policies. After Trump’s earlier proposal, the University of California issued a statement calling the order “misguided and unnecessary.” President Robert Zimmer of the University of Chicago, a champion of free speech, said an executive order would be “a grave error” and could actually chill free speech.
And some worry the order could backfire. If a speaking event threatens to turn violent, for example, some say they might have to choose between canceling the event for safety and allowing it to continue to preserve federal funding. Some say it could force religious universities to host speakers with views that conflict with the universities’ values.