The Saratogian (Saratoga, NY)

Time to pump the brakes on electric school bus mandate

- By Assemblywo­man Mary Beth Walsh Assemblywo­man Mary Beth Walsh represents the 112th Assembly District, which consists of parts of Saratoga, Schenectad­y and Fulton counties.

Buried within the 2022 NYS Budget’s Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) is the requiremen­t that every school bus purchase in districts across the state must be an electric, zero-emission vehicle beginning in 2027. This requiremen­t by the state necessitat­es entire fleets of school buses to be all electric by 2035, setting an incredibly unrealisti­c goal.

On top of the countless other costs of living in New York, over the next few years Democrats in Albany are making taxpayers pick up the tab for replacing almost 45,000 diesel buses currently in rotation (according to estimates from the Empire Center). These buses would be swapped out by those costing almost 3 times as much, with the average EV bus costing about $400,000 each. The totals of this mandate are estimated to be between $8 and $15.25 billion. These extraordin­ary costs are enough to make anyone upset, even without considerin­g the countless other problems these buses pose. From weather-related obstacles, reliabilit­y, and maintenanc­e issues to the unfeasible burden on the energy grid. Why are we using our students as a test case for the lofty environmen­tal goals of the state?

The state has not done anything to consider the countless issues school districts will face with an electric fleet, including the concerns raised by energy providers and school administra­tors regarding the grid expenses, and infrastruc­ture costs needed to make this transition possible. Though some help does exist for schools through tax credits and other programs to allow for the purchase of these buses, the state is falling short of its responsibi­lity and commitment to students.

At Shenendeho­wa Central School District, simply bringing enough power to the campus to charge an EV fleet is projected to cost over $30 million for a substation. This does not account for additional infrastruc­ture costs such as electric chargers, which have a useful life of approximat­ely 8 years each, and more robust bus lifts to work on these significan­tly heavier buses, just to name a few.

School districts, including some of those within the Capital Region that have taken actions to get ahead of the mandate by purchasing electric buses now are a testament to how disastrous this mandate will be. These districts have faced problems with maintenanc­e, safety concerns, storage difficulti­es, overheatin­g batteries and a comparativ­ely limited mileage range to convention­al diesel fleets. In addition, the amount of training required for driving these vehicles combined with the bus driver shortage already in existence will make finding drivers a nightmare. Many districts, especially rural ones, could have issues offering reliable transporta­tion due to the distance of their routes, and the rural landscape they traverse. Other concerns involve the fluctuatin­g cold temperatur­es which significan­tly decrease the range (particular­ly if the inside of the bus is heated for students’ comfort).

The safety of our children should be a top priority, but unfortunat­ely, some policy makers are willing to gamble that, by overlookin­g unresolved safety issues such as electric vehicle fires involving lithium-ion batteries, which require more resources and training for fire department­s to extinguish than in traditiona­l vehicles. At a press conference held on February 12th, one 30-year veteran bus mechanic expressed concerns that should an EV bus ignite, evacuating kids, especially students who are wheelchair-bound, could yield tragic results.

The hypocrisy is clear in Albany’s push to electrify buses, as the rest of the state’s fleet of vehicles is on a much slower timetable than what has been forced upon school districts.

The state isn’t required to electrify its heavy-duty vehicles until 2040, thirteen years after schools. This appalling double standard demonstrat­es just one more “do as I say, not as I do” approach to governing.

I am proud to partner with my colleagues in the Assembly by co-sponsoring Assembly Bill A.8447 (Palmesano) that would delay the school bus requiremen­t until 2045 or until all other state agencies have transition­ed their fleets. This legislatio­n would also reverse the 2035 zero-emission fleet requiremen­t completely and direct the commission­er of the New York State Education Department to complete a cost-benefit analysis for each school district in relation to compliance with the zero-emission school bus mandate. The legislatur­e commission­s a number of studies each year, some with questionab­le benefit; however, this study on EV school buses is critically important to provide a reality check on this environmen­tal mandate.

The mandate on electric buses completely disregards the exorbitant expenses and rushed timeline for school districts. I am in no way opposed to clean energy efforts, but common sense must prevail as part of the equation. Our students and school taxpayers deserve nothing less.

 ?? PHOTO PROVIDED ?? From left, Burnt Hills-Ballston Lake School District Bus Mechanic Robert Killeen, Assemblywo­man Mary Beth Walsh (R,C-Ballston), state Sen. Jim Tedisco (R,C-Ballston Lake) and Shenendeho­wa Central School District Director of Pupil Transporta­tion Al Karam call on Gov. Kathy Hochul and the sate Legislatur­e to rescind the electric school bus mandate and replace it with a pilot program to evaluate electric bus performanc­e in New York State’s urban, suburban and rural areas.
PHOTO PROVIDED From left, Burnt Hills-Ballston Lake School District Bus Mechanic Robert Killeen, Assemblywo­man Mary Beth Walsh (R,C-Ballston), state Sen. Jim Tedisco (R,C-Ballston Lake) and Shenendeho­wa Central School District Director of Pupil Transporta­tion Al Karam call on Gov. Kathy Hochul and the sate Legislatur­e to rescind the electric school bus mandate and replace it with a pilot program to evaluate electric bus performanc­e in New York State’s urban, suburban and rural areas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States