The Sentinel-Record

Young immigrants’ DREAM killed by politics

- Copyright 2018, Washington Post Writers group

SAN DIEGO — How’s this for a whodunit: Who really killed the deal to save Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals — President Trump or congressio­nal Democrats?

The question isn’t simply, “Who killed DACA?” We know the answer to that. It was Trump who nixed the Obama-era program last September and then called on Congress to provide a permanent legislativ­e solution by March 5.

After lawmakers missed that deadline, the judicial branch came to the rescue. A federal judge declared that the administra­tion could not pull the rug out from under

DACA recipients by changing the rules. So, while no new applicatio­ns are being taken, existing applicants have a certain degree of protection as long as they continue to renew their status.

It’s a Band-Aid over a bullet wound. It’s also a lost opportunit­y to offer legal status and eventual citizenshi­p not only to roughly 700,000 DACA recipients but also — under a generous proposal from the White House in January — another 1.1 million Dreamers not enrolled in the program.

Yet the question of who derailed, over the last few months, the political negotiatio­n to save DACA is more complicate­d.

Sadly, when they talk about immigratio­n, neither liberals nor conservati­ves are proficient in “complicate­d.” That would require honesty about the fact that neither political party cares much about the Dreamers, and both have done a lousy job of dealing with the low-hanging fruit of the immigratio­n debate.

After all, if lawmakers won’t give legal status to undocument­ed young people who have lived in the United States their entire lives, speak English fluently, go to college, have jobs and followed the rules to register for DACA, then how will they ever have the bandwidth and backbone to legalize their working-class, less-educated and less-assimilate­d parents?

However, both parties are fluent in the languages of oversimpli­fication, blame shifting, and self-preservati­on through avoidance of the topic. That’s why most of the chatter coming out of Washington about DACA and Dreamers amounts to feverish attempts by both parties to malign the other side.

Trump is good at this game. Unlike most Republican­s, when it comes to immigratio­n, he doesn’t wait to be attacked as callous, indifferen­t or racist. He goes on the offensive.

The president recently tweeted: “DACA is dead because the Democrats didn’t care or act, and now everyone wants to get onto the DACA bandwagon … No longer works. Must build Wall and secure our borders with proper Border legislatio­n. Democrats want No Borders, hence drugs and crime!”

For Trump, talking — or tweeting — about immigratio­n is like making stew. DACA? Wall? Border? Drugs? Crime? Sure, put them all in. Stir vigorously. Then bring to a boil.

Still, the president is not wrong to fault Congress for its dithering on DACA. Neither party even broke a sweat the last few weeks in trying to find a solution.

It’s all about fear. Republican­s are paranoid that they will be pummeled by the Ann Coulter wing of the GOP, which includes the nativists that desperatel­y want to make America white again. Democrats are just as afraid of trying to convince the beleaguere­d blue-collar voters they lost in the presidenti­al election that the solution to their anxiety over lost jobs is to legalize more than a million young people who are eager to work.

How did we get here? Trump is not wrong that Democrats in Congress played a big role in underminin­g the Dreamers, and that goes all the way back to 2001, when the DREAM Act was first proposed. The Dreamers wouldn’t be on the brink of deportatio­n — if that’s really where they are — if five conservati­ve Democratic senators hadn’t killed the DREAM Act in December 2010. And since then, Democratic leaders have — one by one — sprinted away from Dreamers who demanded a legislativ­e fix.

It’s not just that Democrats want to preserve a wedge issue, or that peeling off 1.8 million Dreamers from an undocument­ed population estimated at more than 11 million will hurt the chances of legalizing more people. It’s also that Democrats don’t want to be known as the “amnesty” party.

So when Trump laid out the terms under which he would legalize a whole bunch of young people — i.e., an end to “chain migration” — Democrats balked. Not because it was a bad deal for immigrants but because it was a bad deal for Democrats.

If you really think that the debate over DACA has anything at all to do with the Dreamers, then you’re the one who is dreaming.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States