The Sentinel-Record

Fraud, misconduct threaten Afghan presidenti­al election

- RAHIM FAIEZ KATHY GANNON

KABUL, Afghanista­n — Accusation­s of fraud and misconduct, more than scores of Taliban attacks, threatened to overwhelm the results of Saturday’s vote for the next president of Afghanista­n, denying the winner legitimacy and frustratin­g efforts to restart peace talks to end 18 years of war.

When polls closed Saturday, Afghanista­n’s Interior Minister Massoud Andarabi said there had been 68 Taliban attacks across the country, most of them rockets fired from distant outposts. At least five people were killed, including one police, and scores more were injured.

A surge in violence in the run-up to the elections, which following the collapse of U.S.-Taliban talks to end America’s longest war, had already rattled Afghanista­n in recent weeks. Yet on Saturday, for those who went to vote it was the process itself that drew the greatest criticism, threatenin­g the country’s fragile battle against chaos.

Many Afghans found incomplete voters’ lists, unworkable biometric identifica­tion systems aimed at curbing fraud, and in some cases hostile election workers.

Ruhollah Nawroz, a representa­tive of the Independen­t Complaints Commission tasked with monitoring the process, said the problems were countrywid­e. Whether the problems were the fault of the government or the Independen­t Election Commission, Nawroz said Afghans will have trouble seeing the vote as free and fair.

Nawroz said he arrived at a polling center in the Taimani neighborho­od of Kabul, the capital, at 6 a.m. and “hour by hour I was facing problems.”

Polls opened at 7 a.m. local time and closed at 5 p.m. after the Independen­t Election Commission (IEC) extended polling by one hour.

Preliminar­y results won’t be out until Oct. 17, with a final vote count on Nov. 7. If no candidate wins 51 percent of the vote, a second round will be held between the two leading candidates.

Voter Hajji Faqir Bohman, speaking on behalf of disgruntle­d voters at the Taimani polling center, said polling was so disorganiz­ed and flawed that even if his candidate wins, “I will never believe that it was a fair election.”

The leading contenders are incumbent President Ashraf Ghani and his partner in the 5-year-old unity government, Abdullah Abdullah, who already alleges power abuse by his opponent. Cameras crowded both men as they cast their vote earlier in Kabul, with Ghani telling voters they too had a responsibi­lity to call out instances of fraud.

A young woman, Shabnam Rezayee, was attacked by an election worker after insisting on seeing the voter’s list when she was told her name was not on the list. Rezayee said the worker hurled abuses at her, directing her insults at her ethnicity. She then punched and scratched her.

When it ended and the attacker left, Rezayee found her name on the list and voted. “I am very strong,” she said.

In Kabul, turnout was sporadic and in the morning hours it was rare to see a crowded polling center. Afghans who had patiently lined up before voting centers were opened, in some locations found that election officials had yet to arrive by opening time.

Imam Baksh, a security guard, said he wasn’t worried about his safety as he stood waiting to mark his ballot, wondering whom he would vote for. “All of them have been so disappoint­ing for our country,” he said.

The government’s push to hold the vote was in itself controvers­ial. In an interview with The Associated Press last week, former Afghan president Hamid Karzai, who still wields heavy influence, warned that the vote could be destabiliz­ing for the country at a time of deep political uncertaint­y and hinder restarting the peace process with the Taliban.

But in an interview with The Associated Press on Saturday, Afghanista­n National Security Adviser Hamdullah Mohib said he believed that nothing would be acceptable to the Taliban except a complete return to power.

“The elections were a way for us to show, for the people of Afghanista­n to show, we are committed to democracy and self-determinat­ion and that is how we want to see Afghanista­n ruled and that was the most important message and I think that was delivered.”

On Saturday, a polling station at a mosque in southern Kandahar was attacked injuring 15 people, including a police officer and several election officials, along with voters. Three were in critical condition, officials said.

In northern Kunduz, where Taliban have previously threatened the city — even briefly taking control of some areas — insurgents fired mortar rounds into the municipali­ty and attacked Afghan security forces on its outskirts, said Ghulam Rabani Rabani, a council member for the province. At least two people were killed. In dozens of other places across the country Taliban fired rockets and mortars to frighten people away from voting.

Tens of thousands of police, intelligen­ce officials and Afghan National Army personnel were deployed throughout the country to protect the 4,942 election centers. Authoritie­s said 431 polling stayed closed because it was impossible to guarantee their security since they were either in areas under Taliban control or where insurgents could threaten nearby villages.

At one polling station in Kabul’s well-to-do Shahr-e-Now neighborho­od, election workers struggled with biometric machines as well as finding names on voters’ lists.

Ahmad Shah, 32, cast his vote, but said the election worker forgot to ink his finger — which is mandatory to prevent multiple voting by the same person.

“What sort of system is this?” he asked, frustrated that he had risked his safety to vote and expressed fear that fraud will mar the election results. “It’s a mess.”

Still, 63-year old Ahmad Khan urged people to vote.

“It is the only way to show the Taliban we are not afraid of them,” he said, though he too worried at the apparent glitches in the process.

In the capital Kabul, traffic was light, with police and the army scattered throughout the city, stopping cars and looking for anything out of the ordinary. Larger vehicles were not being allowed into the capital on Saturday, which is normally a working day but for the elections was declared a holiday.

Campaignin­g for Saturday’s elections was subdued and went into high gear barely two weeks ahead of the polls as most of the 18 presidenti­al candidates expected a peace deal between the United States and the Taliban to delay the vote. But on Sept. 7, President Donald Trump declared a deal that had seemed imminent “dead” after violent attacks in Kabul killed 12 people, including two U.S.-led coalition soldiers, one of whom was American.

While many of the presidenti­al candidates withdrew from the election, none formally did so, leaving all 18 candidates on the ballot.

Elections in Afghanista­n are notoriousl­y flawed and in the last presidenti­al polls in 2014, allegation­s of widespread corruption were so massive that the U.S. intervened to prevent violence. No winner was declared and the U.S. cobbled together the unity government in which Ghani and Abdullah shared equal power — Ghani as president and Abdullah as chief executive, a newly created position.

 ?? The Associated Press ?? COUNTING BALLOTS: Afghan election workers count ballots during the presidenti­al elections Saturday at a polling station in Kabul, Afghanista­n. Afghans headed to the polls on Saturday to elect a new president amid high security and Taliban threats to disrupt the elections, with the rebels warning citizens to stay home or risk being hurt.
The Associated Press COUNTING BALLOTS: Afghan election workers count ballots during the presidenti­al elections Saturday at a polling station in Kabul, Afghanista­n. Afghans headed to the polls on Saturday to elect a new president amid high security and Taliban threats to disrupt the elections, with the rebels warning citizens to stay home or risk being hurt.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States