The Sentinel-Record

New Navy aircraft carrier inquiry suggests tough scrutiny of admirals

- ROBERT BURNS AND LOLITA C. BALDOR

WASHINGTON — The Navy is launching a wider investigat­ion of the coronaviru­s crisis aboard the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, suggesting closer and deeper scrutiny of actions and decisions by senior admirals in the Pacific that led to the controvers­ial firing of the ship’s commander nearly a month ago.

The move announced Wednesday effectivel­y delays a decision on whether to go ahead with a Navy recommenda­tion that Capt. Brett E. Crozier be restored to command of the Roosevelt, which has been docked in Guam for weeks. Crozier was fired after pleading for urgent Navy action to protect his crew.

The expanded inquiry suggests the Navy is looking to hold someone accountabl­e for the most severe virus outbreak to strike the U.S. military. It has infected nearly 1,000 sailors, killing one, and temporaril­y hobbled an aircraft carrier vital to the Navy’s mission of countering China’s power in the Asia-Pacific region.

The new investigat­ion was announced by James E. McPherson, the acting Navy secretary, who said in a brief statement that an initial inquiry proved insufficie­nt. “I have unanswered questions that the preliminar­y inquiry has identified and that can only be answered by a deeper review,” said McPherson, a retired rear admiral who had served as the Navy’s judge advocate general, its top lawyer.

That is a switch from last week when McPherson and the top Navy officer, Adm. Mike Gilday, presented to Defense Secretary Mark Esper their recommenda­tion that Crozier be reinstated, based on the outcome of a preliminar­y inquiry by the Navy’s No. 2 admiral.

There was no outward indication at the time of the Esper meeting that McPherson believed the initial inquiry was inadequate. But officials said that during the meeting, Army Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, suggested a broader, more thorough investigat­ion was needed.

The expanded investigat­ion is expected to examine communicat­ion and leadership actions in the Navy chain of command in the Pacific, to include events before the initial virus outbreak in late March, officials said. This likely includes the decision to make a port visit to Da Nang, Vietnam, which has been cited as a possible source of the infection aboard the Roosevelt. That decision was made by Adm. Phil Davidson, who as commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command is in charge of all forces in that region.

Crozier had sent a note to several commanders pleading for more urgent Navy action, including the removal of nearly all sailors from the ship to protect their health. The acting Navy secretary at the time, Thomas Modly, accused Cozier of bad judgment and directed that he be relieved of command April 2. Days later, amid an uproar of his handling of the matter, Modly resigned and was replaced by McPherson.

Crozier has been quarantine­d off the ship since his firing and is recovering after testing positive for the virus. The decision to extend the investigat­ion for another month keeps him in limbo. For now, he is assigned to the commander of Naval Air Forces, Vice Adm. DeWolfe Miller. If he is not reinstated to command before the Roosevelt leaves Guam, he would likely fly to San Diego to await the results of the investigat­ion.

In his statement, McPherson did not reveal what questions he thinks the initial inquiry left unanswered.

“I am directing Adm. Gilday to conduct a follow-on command investigat­ion,” McPherson said. “This investigat­ion will build on the good work of the initial inquiry to provide a more fulsome understand­ing of the sequence of events, actions, and decisions of the chain of command surroundin­g the COVID-19 outbreak aboard USS Theodore Roosevelt.”

The wider investigat­ion is intended to last no longer than 30 days, according to one defense official who discussed the matter on condition of anonymity to provide details that go beyond McPherson’s statement.

The Gilday review probably will address Crozier’s concerns that his superiors were not acting fact enough to protect the crew from the spreading virus. Those leaders would include Rear Adm. Stuart Baker, commander of the carrier strike group, who was aboard the Roosevelt with Crozier; the 7th Fleet commander, Vice Adm. William R. Merz; and the Pacific Fleet commander, Adm. John C. Aquilino, as well as Davidson, head of Indo-Pacific Command.

Nearly 1,000 sailors from the Roosevelt have contracted the coronaviru­s; one has died. The outbreak is the most severe in the U.S. military, which is seeking to balance a need to protect troops while also maintainin­g U.S. defenses. In recent days a second ship, the USS Kidd, reported a coronaviru­s outbreak at sea. It pulled into port at San Diego on Tuesday with at least 64 sailors infected, reflecting more efficient action by the Navy to address the threat posed by the virus in close quarters.

After weeks in quarantine or isolation in Guam, hundreds of members of the Roosevelt crew are beginning to move back onto the ship in a transition that will take days. According to the Navy’s 7th Fleet, the more than 4,000 sailors who have tested negative will return to the ship in waves. The roughly 700 sailors who have been running the ship while in port will move ashore and into quarantine.

In the weeks since the ship arrived in Guam in late March, sail- ors have been cleaning areas and then closing them off.

 ?? The Associated Press ?? USS KIDD: The USS Kidd passes downtown San Diego as it returns to Naval Base San Diego, Tuesday, as seen from Coronado, Calif.
The Associated Press USS KIDD: The USS Kidd passes downtown San Diego as it returns to Naval Base San Diego, Tuesday, as seen from Coronado, Calif.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States