The Sentinel-Record

Microsoft server hack leaves victims hustling to stop intruders

- FRANK BAJAK, ERIC TUCKER AND MATT O’BRIEN

BOSTON — Victims of a massive global hack of Microsoft email server software — estimated in the tens of thousands by cybersecur­ity responders — hustled Monday to shore up infected systems and try to diminish chances that intruders might steal data or hobble their networks.

The White House has called the hack an “active threat” and said senior national security officials were addressing it.

The breach was discovered in early January and attributed to Chinese cyber spies targeting U.S. policy think tanks. Then in late February, five days before Microsoft issued a patch on March 2, there was an explosion of infiltrati­ons by other intruders, piggybacki­ng on the initial breach. Victims run the spectrum of organizati­ons that run email servers, from mom-and-pop retailers to law firms, municipal government­s, healthcare providers and manufactur­ers.

While the hack doesn’t pose the kind of national security threat as the more sophistica­ted SolarWinds campaign, which the Biden administra­tion blames on Russian intelligen­ce officers, it can be an existentia­l threat for victims who didn’t install the patch in time and now have hackers lingering in their systems.

The hack poses a new challenge for the White House, which even as it prepares to respond to the SolarWinds breach, must now grapple with a formidable and very different threat from China.

“I would say it’s a serious economic security threat because so many small companies out there can literally have their business destroyed through a targeted ransomware attack,” said Dmitri Alperovitc­h, former chief technical officer of the cybersecur­ity firm CrowdStrik­e.

He blames China for the global wave of infections that began Feb. 26, though other researcher­s say it’s too early to confidentl­y attribute them.

It’s a mystery how those hackers got wind of the initial breach because no one knew about this except a few researcher­s, Alperovitc­h said.

After the patch was released, a third wave of infections began, a piling on that typically occurs in such cases because Microsoft dominates the software market and offers a single point of attack.

Cybersecur­ity analysts trying to pull together a complete picture of the hack said their analyses concur with the figure of 30,000 U.S. victims published Friday by cybersecur­ity blogger Brian Krebs. Alperovitc­h said about 250,000 global victims has been estimated.

Microsoft has declined to say how many customers it believes are infected.

David Kennedy, CEO of cybersecur­ity firm TrustedSec, said hundreds of thousands of organizati­ons could have been vulnerable to the hack.

“Anybody that had Exchange installed was potentiall­y vulnerable,” he said. “It’s not every single one but it’s a large percentage of them.”

Katie Nickels, director of intelligen­ce at the cybersecur­ity firm Red Canary, warned that installing patches won’t be enough to protect those already infected. “If you patch today that is going to protect you going forward but if the adversarie­s are already in your system then you need to take care of that,” she said.

A smaller number of organizati­ons were targeted in the initial intrusion by hackers who grabbed data, stole credential­s or explored inside networks and left backdoors at universiti­es, defense contractor­s, law firms and infectious-disease research centers, researcher­s said.

Among those Kennedy has been working with are manufactur­ers worried about intellectu­al property theft, hospitals, financial institutio­ns and managed service providers who host multiple company networks.

“On the scale of one to 10, this is a 20,” Kennedy said. “It was essentiall­y a skeleton key to open up any company that had this Microsoft product installed.”

Asked for comment, the Chinese embassy in Washington pointed to remarks last week from Foreign Ministry spokespers­on saying that China “firmly opposes and combats cyber attacks and cyber theft in all forms” and cautioning that attributio­n of cyberattac­ks should be based on evidence and not “groundless accusation­s.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States