The Sentinel-Record

Census will reshape boundaries of political maps

- Emily Wagster Pettus AP news analysis Emily Wagster Pettus has covered Mississipp­i government and politics since 1994.

JACKSON, Miss. — States are set to receive detailed Census informatio­n in September, and Mississipp­i legislator­s will use those numbers in a tough political battle — deciding how to redraw the four U.S. House districts and the 174 state legislativ­e districts.

Republican­s control both chambers of the Legislatur­e and the committees that will draw new district lines, so they have an advantage over Democrats.

Three of Mississipp­i’s U.S. House districts are ma- jority-white and held by Republican­s, and one is majority-Black and held by a Democrat. That balance is unlikely to change.

The boundaries of the majority-Black 2nd District will need to expand because people have been moving out of the rural Delta during the past decade. A similar expansion was needed, for the same reason, during redistrict­ing 10 years ago.

A 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision in an Alabama case eliminated the requiremen­t for states with a history of racial discrimina­tion, including Mississipp­i, to receive federal approval of redistrict­ing plans or changes in election laws. That preclearan­ce requiremen­t was in Section 5 of the federal Voting Rights Act.

But people drawing Mississipp­i’s new congressio­nal boundaries should not be able to obliterate the majority-Black congressio­nal district because Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibits discrimina­tion against minority voters.

Republican­s also have their own interest in keeping at least one majority-Black congressio­nal district in a state with a population that is 38% Black. Historical patterns show Black voters are more likely to support Democrats. Obliterati­ng the majority-Black district would increase the Black population in majority-white districts, and that would give Democrats more influence and make elections harder for white Republican candidates.

Mississipp­i dropped from five U.S. House seats to four after the 2000 Census. Democrats firmly controlled the state House of Representa­tives at the time, but Republican­s were gaining influence in the state Senate. The two sides deadlocked on drawing new U.S. House maps after the 2000 Census, and federal judges took over the task. Federal judges also drew Mississipp­i’s congressio­nal districts after the 2010 Census.

Congressio­nal districts are supposed to be as equal as possible in population, but changes inside Mississipp­i during the past decade have thrown the existing districts out of balance.

A handy Census Bureau site shows 2019 population estimates for each congressio­nal district, including details about demographi­cs. Mississipp­i’s estimated population then was 2,976,149. Divide that by four, and the ideal population of a congressio­nal district at that point — years after the last redistrict­ing — would be about 744,037. Two of the current congressio­nal districts are over that ideal number, and two are under.

The 4th District, in the southernmo­st part of the state, had an estimated 775,679 people in 2019. The 1st District, up north, had an estimated 769,026.

The 2nd District stretches along the most of the western side of the state, through the Delta and into Jackson. It had the smallest estimated population in 2019, at 692,452. The 3rd District runs diagonally from the southweste­rn corner of the state, up through the Jackson suburbs and to Starkville. It was closest to the ideal average, with an estimated population of 738,992.

The Census Bureau released its 2020 numbers in late April, and those showed that West Virginia, Mississipp­i and Illinois were the only states to lose population during the past decade. Mississipp­i will keep four U.S. House seats.

Mississipp­i’s 2020 population was 2,963,914, according to the Census. That makes the ideal population for each congressio­nal district 740,949.

Redrawing congressio­nal district lines could be contentiou­s, but redrawing lines for the 122 state House districts and the 52 state Senate districts could be worse because redistrict­ing committee members will be dealing with the political futures of colleagues they see face-to-face.

Fast-growing DeSoto County could gain more representa­tion at the state Capitol. That will come at the expense of slow-growing areas where the boundaries of current legislativ­e districts will stretched or erased. To be clear: Every Mississipp­i resident will end up with elected representa­tives, but some politician­s and some constituen­ts will be unhappy with the outcome.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States