The Sentinel-Record

Arkansas House passes measure restrictin­g ‘adult’ performanc­es

- ANDREW DEMILLO

LITTLE ROCK — The Arkansas House voted Monday to restrict “adult-oriented” performanc­es, revamping a measure that previously targeted drag shows following discrimina­tion complaints from the LGBTQ community.

The bill approved by the majority-Republican House on a 78-15 vote no longer explicitly adds drag shows to the list of businesses considered “adult-oriented,” easing some of the concerns of LGBTQ advocates and other opponents. The bill now heads back to the majority-Republican Senate, which approved an earlier version of the restrictio­n.

“This bill is not about whether drag is acceptable,” Republican Rep. Mary Bentley, the bill’s sponsor, told House members before the vote. “It’s about whether we should be exposing our children to sexually explicit behavior.”

Arkansas is one of several states where Republican lawmakers have proposed restrictio­ns on drag shows, which have been targeted by right-wing activists and politician­s in recent months. Protesters have appeared at events like drag story hours, in which colorfully clad drag queens read books to children. Opponents of such events have claimed they’re harmful to children.

Under the current version of Arkansas’ bill, the restricted performanc­es would include performers who are nude or seminude, and purposely exposing a specific anatomical area, or prosthetic breasts or genitalia. To meet the definition, the performanc­e must feature real or simulated sexual activities and be intended to appeal to “prurient” interests, a term that’s not defined in the legislatio­n.

The performanc­es would be banned from public property, from being paid for with public funds and from allowing minors to attend.

The original version of the legislatio­n would have classified drag shows as adult-oriented businesses, the same category as adult theaters and strip clubs, which would have banned them from being with 1,000 feet of public schools, churches and libraries.

The top Democrat in the House said that, even with the changes, the bill was too vaguely worded and worried about how far it could end up being interprete­d.

“I think if people are going to get penalized for doing something, they should understand what the parameters are of that and what the definition­s are,” Rep. Tippi McCullough, the House minority leader, said.

A spokeswoma­n for Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders last week said the Republican supported the amended version of the legislatio­n.

Opponents of the legislatio­n said the amended version is an improvemen­t over the original proposal that specifical­ly targeted drag shows. That proposal prompted worries that it could restrict other performanc­es where actors or actresses portray someone of the opposite sex, and would even restrict transgende­r people’s activities.

“This takes down our temperatur­e and our concern about the bill quite significan­tly,” said Sarah Warbelow, legal director of the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest LGBTQ civil rights group. But Warbelow said she doesn’t think the law is necessary, given existing laws addressing performanc­es that are inappropri­ate for minors.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas called the changes “progress,” but said the bill still poses constituti­onal concerns since it could prevent some artists from performing in public places.

“Violating the First Amendment rights of all people is not an acceptable proposal to substitute for the targeting of some Arkansans,” the group said in a statement released on its website last week.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States