The Sentinel-Record

Senate panel endorses bill targeting trans care

- WILL LANGHORNE

LITTLE ROCK — A Senate panel on Monday endorsed a bill that would allow a person who received a “gender transition procedure” as a minor to sue the health profession­al who performed the procedure.

Senate Bill 199, by Sen. Gary Stubblefie­ld, R-Branch, passed in a voice vote in the Senate Committee on Judiciary with audible dissent from Sen. Clarke Tucker, D-Little Rock.

Testimony during the more than two hours of discussion became heated at times. Sen. Matt McKee, R-Pearcy, drew disapprova­l from many of those gathered when he asked a transgende­r woman who spoke against the bill if she had a penis.

Stubblefie­ld said his bill is needed to protect children from “gender transition procedures” including puberty blockers and reassignme­nt surgeries, which he characteri­zed as “chemical castration” and “mutilation.”

Supporters questioned the ability of minors to consent to procedures covered by the bill, and noted the legislatio­n would not outlaw “gender transition procedures” but would provide legal recourse for those who receive the procedures.

Opponents of the bill argued it would unfairly limit treatments for transgende­r people, especially those with mental illness, and could violate the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constituti­on. Critics also noted that state code already includes medical malpractic­e laws.

Stubblefie­ld’s bill defines “gender transition procedure” as medical procedures that aim to alter “or remove physical or anatomical characteri­stics or features that are typical for the

individual’s biological sex.” Procedures covered by the bill also include those seeking to instill “or create physiologi­cal or anatomical characteri­stics that resemble a sex different from the individual’s biological sex.”

The bill specifical­ly points to “puberty-blocking drugs,” “cross-sex hormones” and “genital or nongenital gender reassignme­nt surgery.”

Under the bill, a healthcare profession­al who performs a “gender transition procedure” is liable to the minor if the minor is “injured, including without limitation any physical, psychologi­cal, emotional, or physiologi­cal injury, by the gender transition procedure, related treatment, or the after effects of the gender transition procedure or related treatment.”

A minor injured by a “gender transition procedure” or a representa­tive for the minor would be permitted by the bill to bring a civil action against the health profession­al for declarator­y or inductive relief, compensato­ry damages, punitive damages and attorney’s fee and costs.

Legal action under the legislatio­n would have to be taken within 30 years of the minor turning 18 or within 30 years of when the minor would have turned 18 if the minor died before turning 18. The current statute of limitation­s for most medical malpractic­e cases in Arkansas is two years, according to state law.

The bill includes a “safe harbor” section that would provide healthcare profession­als with a defense against legal action. Among other requiremen­ts, healthcare profession­als would have to document a minor’s “perceived gender or perceived sex for two (2) continuous years” and receive the voluntary and informed consent of the minor and their parents before performing a procedure.

For minors who “suffered from a mental health concern,” at least two healthcare profession­als, including at least one mental health profession­al, would have to certify in writing that “the gender transition procedure was the only way to treat the mental health concern.”

At least two profession­als, including at least one mental health profession­al, also would have to certify in writing that “the minor suffered from no other mental health concerns, including without limitation depression, eating disorders, autism, attention deficit hyperactiv­ity disorder, intellectu­al disability, or psychotic disorders.”

In its definition of “gender transition procedures,” the bill excludes several treatments including services to “persons born with a medically verifiable disorder of sex developmen­t” and any “procedure undertaken because the individual suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness that would, as certified by a physician, place the individual in imminent danger of death or impairment of major bodily function unless surgery is performed.”

 ?? Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/Tommy Metthe ?? ■ Sen. Gary Stubblefie­ld speaks about a transgende­r bill in the Senate judiciary committee at the state Capitol in Little Rock on Monday.
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/Tommy Metthe ■ Sen. Gary Stubblefie­ld speaks about a transgende­r bill in the Senate judiciary committee at the state Capitol in Little Rock on Monday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States