The Signal

Caforio, Knight expand war chests

Challenger raised more money than incumbent, latest report shows

- By Kevin Kenney Signal Staff Writer

In the hotly contested horse race for California’s 25th Congressio­nal District seat, Democratic challenger Bryan Caforio outraised and outspent incumbent Steve Knight in the most recent quarterly report to the Federal Election Commission – but Knight’s campaign has more money on hand and says it is poised for a big ad blitz in the final strides.

According to both campaigns’ financial-disclosure reports – which were due this past Saturday and are posted on the FEC’s website – Caforio’s campaign raised $586,673 in the period between July 1 and Sept. 30, compared to Knight’s $334,643.

Of Caforio’s $586,673 total contributi­ons in the quarter, $412,773 came from individual­s, while $173,900 came from various political committees, such as the state party committee, and political-action committees, or PACS.

Of the $334,643 raised by Knight’s campaign in the quarter, $133,743 came from individual donors, while $200,900 came from committees.

Federal election law caps individual donations to a particular candidate at $2,700 per election, while multi-candidate PACs are limited to $5,000

contributi­ons for each candidate per election — as are state/district/local party committees and national party committees.

In the spending department, Caforio’s campaign listed $527,981 in operating expenditur­es for the quarter, while Knight’s team listed $489,923.

Overall campaign

In the bigger picture – over the course of the entire contentiou­s campaign — Team Caforio has also outspent Knight, but the GOP incumbent has outraised the Democrat overall, fueled by a big edge in committee and PAC contributi­ons.

Since their campaigns began, Caforio’s team lists $971,606 in total operating expenditur­es compared to Knight’s $896,152.

But Knight has, overall, outraised Caforio — $1,376,196 for the Republican, $1,170,254 for the Democrat.

Knight owns that lead in

overall contributi­ons thanks in large part to committees and PACs — and mainly on the front end of the campaign rather than from the most recent quarter, the disclosure documents show.

While Caforio’s campaign lists $348,100 in committee/PAC contributi­ons since he launched his challenge, Team Knight lists $860,576 in that category since the Republican began his reelection bid.

Reserve cash

With three weeks left before Election Day, the bottom lines show Knight with $478,879 in “cash on hand,” compared to Caforio’s $225,852.

That foretells a big Knight push — or more precisely, push-back — down the stretch, the congressma­n’s campaign spokesman, Matt Rexroad, confirmed to The Signal on Monday.

“You can’t win a campaign in September or July, but you sure can in October,” Rexroad said of the impending push. “That’s as we planned.”

Knight has been the target of

a steady stream of negative fliers — many funded by the state Democratic Party, not Caforio’s campaign committee — in which Caforio paints the incumbent as “too extreme” on issues ranging from abortion to Social Security to immigratio­n.

Caforio has also said Knight took “nearly $50,000 in money from oil and gas interests” while staying silent on the Porter Ranch gas leak.

In addition, Caforio has linked Knight to GOP presidenti­al nominee Donald Trump. Following the recent video revelation­s of Trump denigratin­g women, Knight issued a statement saying, “I cannot support either candidate for President.’’ But Caforio’s campaign quickly fired back, saying Knight’s condemnati­on of Trump was insufficie­nt.

Rexroad, meanwhile, said the “Congressma­n Knight has deep roots in the district, and a far greater percentage of his contributi­ons have come from within the district.”

That’s been one focus of Knight’s campaign — alleging that Caforio is an outsider.

Knight — in a flier paid for by his campaign committee, not the state party — has painted Caforio as “a Beverly Hills trial lawyer who moved into our community less than a year ago” and quoted a newspaper article as calling him “a carpetbagg­er.”

A phone call to Caforio’s campaign office Monday afternoon was not returned.

Targeting

The battle for the 25th District has been superheate­d from the start, with Democrats targeting the seat of the one-term incumbent Knight.

Knight has been labeled “the most vulnerable incumbent in California” by the Cook Political Report, a nonpartisa­n online newsletter. A big reason for that is a new demographi­c skew emerging in the district, with registered Democrats moving past Republican­s by 5,842 voters as of Sept. 9, according to California’s Secretary of State’s office.

The district — which encompasse­s parts of Los Angeles and Ventura counties, which include segments of the Santa Clarita, Simi and Antelope valleys - recorded 141,686 Democrats and 135,844 Republican­s as of Sept. 9. There are also 11,821 registered as either Independen­t or Green.

Knight is a member of the National Republican Congressio­nal Committee’s “Patriot Program,” designed to channel money to incumbents deemed vulnerable, according to Ballotpedi­a.com.

Meanwhile, Caforio is part of the Democratic Congressio­nal Campaign Committee’s “Emerging Races” programs, which targets “campaigns [that] are on track and working hard to put seats in play,” Ballotpedi­a reports.

To view each candidate’s complete campaign disclosure form, go to: http://docquery.fec.gov/ pdf/808/2016101590­32679808 /2016101590­32679808.pdf for Knight and http://docquery.fec. gov/pdf/281/2016101490­32528 281/2016101490­32528281.pdf for Caforio. kkenney@signalscv.com

(661) 287-5525

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States