The Signal

The dead can unlock iPhones

When seeking clues to a killer’s plans, time is of the essence

- Elizabeth Weise USA TODAY

SAN FRANCISCO – Your shiny new smartphone may unlock with only your thumbprint, eye or face. But it turns out you don’t need to be alive to get past this unique security barrier, opening new frontiers for individual privacy and law enforcemen­t.

The FBI is struggling to gain access to the iPhone of Texas church gunman Devin Kelley, who killed 25 people, including a pregnant woman whose unborn baby also died. The devastatin­g tragedy has unearthed a gruesome idiosyncra­sy of modern biometric technology: A living person isn’t necessary to unlock many devices.

It turns out the agency likely could have unlocked Kelley’s phone with his thumbprint, if he had enabled Touch ID to unlock it and officials had done so within 48 hours of Kelley’s death by his own hand. That time limit passed, and the phone remains locked, but it raises a question few buyers of the latest iPhone or Samsung typically consider — does someone need to be alive for today’s increasing­ly common biometric recognitio­n systems to work?

In many situations they don’t, said Anil Jain, a professor of computer science at Michigan State University and expert on biometric technology.

Biometrics has to do with body measuremen­ts. In computer circles it’s about using specific individual body measuremen­ts as a way to confirm identity. These include fingerprin­ts and facial recognitio­n software. Beyond computers, some very sophistica­ted secure entryway systems make use of iris recognitio­n, hand geometry and voice recognitio­n.

In the case of Kelley’s iPhone, the limiting factor was the 48-hour clock on how long a fingerprin­t can be used to unlock the phone. This presumes Kelley had Touch ID enabled on his phone, which the FBI has not confirmed. However, about 80% of iPhone users do, according to Apple. Touch ID has existed on all iPhones since the 5S was released in 2013 until the iPhone X, which replaces the Touch ID fingerprin­t with facial recognitio­n.

Forty-eight hours after the last time an iPhone is unlocked with a fingerprin­t, the fingerprin­t function stops working and the user is required to tap in their passcode. If the FBI had tried in that 48-hour period, would it have worked?

Probably, Jain said, depending on how decomposed Kelley’s body was. A rotting body changes shape, including the digits, which distorts fingerprin­ts. How fast it rots depends on where it was found or stored. “Body parts under water and in very hot climate will decompose much faster,” Jain said.

A study done in 2016 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory found that both iris and fingerprin­t biometric data could be obtained from bodies up to four days after death in warmer seasons and for as many as 50 days in winter.

The other hurdle is what kind of fingerprin­t reader is being used: optical or capacitive. Optical systems, such as those used on iPhones, use images to build up highly specific digital maps of the ridges and whorls of the finger. There have been multiple reports of people using simple dental mold models of fingers to reproduce exact finger pattern and open smartphone­s. So it might have been possible for the FBI to simply make a cast of Kelley’s finger to attempt to open his phone.

More sophistica­ted systems use capacitive scanners that use the electrical properties of the human skin as part of the measuremen­t. These are harder to spoof and generally require a living digit, as after death the conductive property of the skin is quickly lost. But it can be accomplish­ed by making a conductive copy of the deceased’s finger, Jain said.

The Samsung Galaxy 8 smartphone incorporat­es iris scanning as one identifica­tion option for users. This, too, can be thwarted, though it’s more difficult.

The same decomposit­ion issues that face those trying to copy a finger are true for the iris, so time is of the essence. It’s also not possible to make a cast of the iris as it’s encased within the eyeball. But a good picture of the iris, which presumably could be taken soon after death, could be used to spoof a system.

A security researcher in Berlin reported being able to engage the Galaxy 8’s iris-recognitio­n ID system simply by making a lifesize print of an image of an eye and then gluing a contact lens to the picture to give it depth. Others have been able to spoof iris-recognitio­n systems with photos alone. So as long as a photo of the iris in question was taken before it began to decompose, it might be possible to get into some systems.

The new iPhone X replaces fingerprin­t recognitio­n with Face ID. Modern facial recognitio­n systems are harder to spoof in part because they build 3-D rather than flat digital models of the face. This is why when iPhone X users start facial recognitio­n, they have to move their head around so the system can get multiple images from which to build its digital model of their face. A dead body makes this difficult.

“It would be hard to turn the head around because rigor mortis can occur as soon as four hours post mortem,” Jain said. One way to get around that might be to move the camera around the stationary head, he suggested.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? Modern facial recognitio­n systems are harder to spoof in part because they build 3-D models of the face.
GETTY IMAGES Modern facial recognitio­n systems are harder to spoof in part because they build 3-D models of the face.
 ?? ANIL JAIN ?? Anil Jain, a professor of computer science at Michigan State University, created a conductive model of a finger, used to spoof a fingerprin­t ID system.
ANIL JAIN Anil Jain, a professor of computer science at Michigan State University, created a conductive model of a finger, used to spoof a fingerprin­t ID system.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States