The Signal

Propositio­n 6 Is a ‘Yes’ Vote

- Betty ARENSON Betty Arenson is a Valencia resident. “Right Here, Right Now” appears Saturdays and rotates among several local Republican­s.

Senate Bill 1 was not passed by or with voter approval. Gov. Jerry Brown broke his promise of no new taxes without voter approval by passing SB1 with his Democrat majority.

SB1 did more than add 12 cents per gallon of gas and 20 cents per gallon for diesel; it increased sales tax on diesel by 4 cents per gallon and significan­tly increased car registrati­on fees for California­ns. Moreover, the taxes will automatica­lly increase annually, as “inflation adjustment­s.”

The Sacramento Bee published SB1’s direction of dollars in April 2017; including:

• $100 million to increase the number of trips by bike and on foot;

• $25 million for the freeway service patrol program; (Don’t we already pay the CHP?)

• $7 million total for transporta­tion-related research and education, University of California ($5 million) and California State University ($2 million); ($7 million to California’s university system?)

• $5 million in workforce developmen­t grants to local agencies. (We pay to train felons.)

• State and local government­s receive $1.49 million and $1.48 million, respective­ly.

• Public transit gets $700 million plus an additional one-time $256 million from “the transporta­tion loan payback”; (What piggy bank is that? The “money will pay for local bus and light-rail systems, new equipment and other capital expenses.”)

• $365 million for “trade” — “projects to improve movement of goods from the state’s large ports and other trade facilities”;

• $250 million for corridors; traffic congestion;

• Money is promised for state parks, off-road vehicle parks, boating programs “and other services from the gas used by such vehicles; (What is the mechanism to separate out those dollars?)

• There is also language placing an “emphasis” on providing “complete streets,” meaning safe spaces for pedestrian­s and bikers along with capturing storm water and other elements.

SB1 was to create another government department called Independen­t Office of Audits as well as a $30 million environmen­tal program.

The anticipate­d revenue is a rosy estimate. A solid source, however, is taking $706 million “from the general fund’s repayment of transporta­tion loans.” A more whimsical item is predicting an annual $100 million from “unspecifie­d Caltrans savings.”

I have written about the farce of SB1 before and a significan­t part of it cannot be exposed enough:

Chapter 2. Road Maintenanc­e and Rehabilita­tion Program. (RMRA)

Section 2030 (a) through (h) include but not limited to: traffic control devices, pedestrian and bicycle facilities and (those) safety projects, “transit facilities, and drainage and stormwater (sic) capture projects…”

Section 2038 brings in the California Developmen­t Workforce Board and State Department of Education; (a) through (f). Mandatory plans for pre-apprentice­ships for women, minorities, the underprivi­leged, disadvanta­ged and underrepre­sented “to help increase their representa­tion in the building and constructi­on trades.”

Subsection (e): outreach those in individual­s “in the local labor market area and to formerly incarcerat­ed individual­s…” There must be coordinati­on between state-approved apprentice­ship programs, engaging “the California Conservati­on Corps and certified community conservati­on corps” to better ensure future employment.

Section 2032 (g): $2 million to the California State University to conduct “transporta­tion research and transporta­tionrelate­d workforce education, training and developmen­t.”

California State Sen. Scott Wilk has seen this monetary charade called SB1 up close and personal. He recently wrote: “The catch was the ‘lockbox’ [Propositio­n 69] was to be sealed on Jan. 1, 2018. In June 2017, during the state budget process, the Democrats stole about 30 percent of the new gas tax money from the “lockbox.” They redirected this funding from roads to such things as the state parks system and job training for felons!

SB 1 is simply a sleight-ofhand shell game. It’s a money grab of epic proportion­s that will not result in a noticeable, longterm solution to the plague of dilapidati­on that has haunted California’s roadways.

Supporting Propositio­n 6 to repeal SB1, The Howard Jarvis Taxpayer Associatio­n estimates SB1 costs a family of four $700 yearly (automatica­lly increasing annually). That’s a family’s vacation, their Christmas or a significan­t part of their auto insurance bill.

The dishonest ballot language cites repealing road repairs. At the least, that is grossly misleading. The words are from Sacramento Democrats who are fighting Prop. 6 by any means necessary to defeat it. Mailers are being sent to voters correcting the ballot language: Propositio­n 6: Gas Tax Repeal Initiative, with succinct, truthful language.

With a citizen’s lock box, money from existing gas tax revenue and motor vehicle sales tax will dedicate money to infrastruc­ture and roads “even after repealing the gas tax”!

YES on Propositio­n 6.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States