The Standard Journal

Coal ash pond closure-in-place plans drawing fire

- By Dave Williams Capitol Beat News Service

ATLANTA — The state is moving forward with plans to leave in place coal ash from some of Georgia Power’s closed ash ponds despite objections from neighbors and environmen­tal groups.

The Georgia Environmen­tal Protection Division (EPD) has issued a draft permit allowing the Atlanta-based utility to cap one of four ash ponds at Plant Hammond in Floyd County near the Coosa River, leaving the ash in an unlined pit. Ash from the other three ponds will be excavated and removed for storage in a lined landfill.

The Plant Hammond ash pond is the first of 10 around the state Georgia Power plans to close in place. Ash from 19 other ponds will be excavated and removed.

Several factors were considered in deciding which ash ponds to excavate and which to close in place, Georgia Power spokesman John Kraft wrote in an email.

“We have worked with thirdparty profession­al engineers and geologists to design our plans on a site-by-site basis considerin­g size, location, amount of material and the geology of the area among other factors,” Kraft wrote. “Each closure design is unique.”

But Georgians who live near ash ponds slated to be closed in place and environmen­tal advocates say all of the ponds should be excavated.

Coal ash contains contaminan­ts including mercury, cadmium and arsenic that can pollute groundwate­r and drinking water.

In the case of Plant Hammond, leaving the ash in an unlined pit will cause it to come into contact with groundwate­r, Jesse Demonbreun-Chapman, executive director of the Coosa River Basin Initiative, said Aug. 10 during a public hearing on the draft permit.

“Allowing it to remain in groundwate­r does not protect the Coosa River or water downstream,” he said. “It should be separated from water.”

Georgia Power is spending an estimated $8.1 billion on a multi-year plan to close all 29 of its ash ponds located at 11 coal-burning power plants across the state to comply with federal and state regulation­s.

The plants – including Plant Hammond – are being retired as the utility reduces its reliance on coal for power generation in order to reach a long-term goal of lower carbon emissions.

Aaron Mitchell, director of environmen­tal affairs for Georgia Power, said the closure-inplace option for ash ponds is one of two authorized by both the EPD and the U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency, the other being excavation and removal.

The EPD’s permitting program for ash ponds due to be closed in place requires postclosur­e care for 30 years, including ongoing maintenanc­e of the cover and groundwate­r monitoring. Results from monitoring must be reported at least twice a year and posted on Georgia Power’s website.

“It addresses both the federal and state rules and establishe­s permitting conditions we will comply with to protect the public health and environmen­t,” Mitchell said. “Safe, effective closure is part of our commitment to the community.”

Opponents of closing ash ponds in place point to Juliette as an example of what can happen when ash left in an unlined pond contaminat­es adjacent groundwate­r. Residents of that community near Georgia Power’s Plant Scherer are suing Georgia Power over contaminat­ion of their drinking water wells.

“Georgia Power is gambling with our public health,” Acworth resident Robert Whorton testified at the Aug. 10 hearing. “I don’t think we should accept toxic coal ash leaching into our groundwate­r.”

Others who spoke at the hearing warned the decision the EPD makes on the Plant Hammond draft permit likely will set a precedent that will affect the other nine closurein-place plans Georgia Power will be seeking from the state agency.

The EPD is accepting written public comment on the draft permit through Sept. 10.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States