The Star Democrat

Democrats should temper their expensive enthusiasm­s with a clear-eyed look at the electorate


WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden has been ever a willow, never an oak, bending under progressiv­e winds. Now, however, congressio­nal Democrats should consider tempering their enthusiasm with lucidity. That is, their enthusiasm about their many expensive enthusiasm­s, with lucidity about the electorate.

This is likely their only way to avoid a dispiritin­g, for them, 2022: Losing control of either congressio­nal chamber would extinguish Biden’s legislativ­e agenda. So, as the Democrats’ kamikaze caucus contemplat­es a (properly scored) $4 trillion-plus Build Back Better gusher to punctuate a year that has seen the highest inflation in 31 years, this caucus should ponder some data:

Biden’s agenda for swollen government resembles Franklin D. Roosevelt’s in 1933 and Lyndon B. Johnson’s in 1965. The stark difference­s are the popular-vote margins that put the three into the presidency: FDR, 17 percentage points; LBJ, 23 points; Biden, 4.5 points. So, in 1933, there were 59 Democratic senators (out of 96) and 313 Democratic representa­tives. In 1965, there were 68 Democratic senators and 295 Democratic representa­tives. Today, the numbers are 50 and 221. Analyst Charlie Cook says of 2020: “The presidenti­al race came down to 125,084 votes spread across Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvan­ia. A flip of just 62,543 votes and Donald Trump would now be [well] into a second term. In the Senate, the Georgia seat that put Democrats over the top was a matter of Jon Ossoff winning just 59,944 more votes than David Perdue. The margin in the House was 31,751 votes across five districts.”

In 2020, five states — Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvan­ia — were won by margins of 1.5 percentage points or less. Biden won all but North Carolina. If Trump had won the three that Biden carried by less than 1 point — Georgia, Wisconsin, Arizona — he would be president.

The 2012 presidenti­al election was the most recent one in which the Democratic candidate carried even 40% of Whites without college educations. Today, according to David Shor, a Democratic consultant, “If you look inside the Democratic Party, there are three times more moderate or conservati­ve nonwhite people than very liberal white people, but very liberal white people are infinitely more represente­d” (emphasis added). And between 2016 and 2020,

Trump increased his success with non-White working-class voters. Biden won a smaller share of both the White and non-White working class vote than Barack Obama received in 2012.

This is one reason Trump is the first incumbent president to increase his vote total — he did by 10 million — while failing to win reelection. Another reason is that just 10% of those who voted for Obama in 2012 and Trump in 2016 voted for Biden in 2020.

Ticket-splitting has declined: In 2020, only 16 of 435 congressio­nal districts were won by a presidenti­al candidate of one party and a House candidate of the other. In 2008, about 71% of Senate elections were won by the party whose presidenti­al candidate carried the state. In 2020, the figure was 95.6%, the same as with House districts. But the three states Biden carried by the largest margins (Maryland, 33.2 points; Massachuse­tts, 33.5; Vermont, 35.4) have Republican governors.

In the 2021-2022 post-census redrawing of congressio­nal districts, Republican­s control legislatur­es in states with 187 districts, and Democrats have complete control in states with just 75. Furthermor­e, House races are susceptibl­e to national waves, and since World War II, average midterm House losses for the president’s party are slightly worse in presidents’ first terms (23) than on average (22). Also, the most recent president to escape a first-term contractio­n of his party’s Senate caucus in midterm elections was John F. Kennedy in 1962.

So, Biden could become the fifth consecutiv­e president to see his party lose control of both the House and the Senate during his tenure. He could even lose both in the first midterm elections of his tenure.This most recently happened not recently — in 1994 and 1954, during Bill Clinton’s and Dwight D. Eisenhower’s first terms, respective­ly.

Today’s polarizati­on is not unpreceden­ted. When a 1936 Gallup poll asked, “Do you believe the acts and policies of the Roosevelt Administra­tion may lead to a dictatorsh­ip?” 9% of Democrats said yes, 83% of Republican­s said yes.Today, however, there is broad agreement among Americans about something: Last week’s Post-ABC News poll revealed that a landslide 59% are concerned that Biden would “do too much to increase the size and role of government.”

Now, about that Build Back Better gusher . . .

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States