Longstanding relationship with Moscow ending over invasion
Santa Clara County Supervisors have unanimously voted to sever its sister-city relationship with Moscow as the Russian invasion of Ukraine approaches its one month mark.
“We are now on day 27 of this invasion that we have all watched in horror,” said District 3 Supervisor Otto Lee, who invoked his past career as a military veteran while condemning Russia. “And certainly many of us feel so hopeless to stop this war that I do believe our action today will be able to work as a voice to help spark the light for these dark matters.”
Santa Clara County has had ties with the city of Moscow since 1994, the same year it established a commission that hosts Russian delegations as form of cultural exchange.
The move March 22 by the supervisors runs counter to how San Jose has approached its own sistercity relationship with Russia, which it has held since 1992. Earlier in the month, the city chose to not sever its ties with Ekaterinburg and instead sent a letter to the leaders of the country's fourth largest city urging peace in Ukraine and support for Russia citizens who oppose the war.
While District 5 Supervisor Joe Simitian on March 22 called the county's move a “symbolic” gesture, he said that some sort of decision had to be made in light of recent events.
“Symbols can be important,” he said. “We are trying, I think, by our action, to make a statement.”
County Executive Jeff Smith, whose office brought the referral on March 22, had stated in early March that in addition to severing ties with Moscow he would also leave open the option of dismantling the Moscow commission, a decision that brought criticism from some of its members. The commission currently has nine members and organizes trips between county residents and Russians. In recent years, Russians have toured county institutions like its courts and local universities such as Stanford.
On March 22, however, Smith had changed his mind, calling the commission's cultural exchanges “positive” and only recommending that government ties be cut. Supervisors also acknowledged the commission's contributions and stated they did not want to see it be disbanded.
But not all commission members are happy with how the meeting turned out.
Nancy Madison, who has been a member of the commission on and off for two decades, said that she worries how actions by the supervisors could affect her group going forward. In addition to cutting off its relationship with Moscow, the board also approved amendments to the commission's bylaws that Madison said could stifle its ability to receive funding for future delegations.
At the moment, however, the commission is unable to bring over any Russian citizens for a visit to the county.
Shortly after Ukraine was invaded, the U.S. government-sponsored organization that helps facilitate the delegations suspended all programs with Russia and its ally Belarus.
The consequences of the sex scandal involving San Jose State University's former head athletic trainer grew greater this week after a class-action lawsuit accused the university of “ignoring clear signs” that young female athletes were being molested.
The university already had agreed to pay upward of $5 million to about two dozen known victims of Scott Shaw, who left the university in 2020 and now is facing federal criminal charges of sexual misconduct.
The class-action case expands the pool of potential victims to any SJSU student who might have been victimized by Shaw since his arrival on campus in 2006.
“There could be over 1,000 women out there who were subjected to Shaw's abuse,” said Palo Alto lawyer Shounak Dharap, who also represents 15 victims of Shaw who won a $3.3 million settlement with the university. “Class actions are a really powerful way to hold institutions accountable, not just to the one or two or 15 people who are filing the lawsuit but to the hundreds or even thousands who may not want to or may not be able to pursue their own cases, but they still deserve justice.”
The scandal caused the downfall of school President
Mary Papazian and Athletic Director Marie Tuite, who both resigned late last year over mishandling of the allegations against Shaw. Shaw, 54, has been arraigned on six federal civil rights charges of sexually assaulting four women from 2017 to 2020 under the guise of treatment. The five-year statute of limitations prevents charging him with older crimes, according to the FBI. Shaw has denied the allegations. He could face six years in prison if convicted.
Despite warning signs that Shaw was a danger to students, the lawsuit says, SJSU and its trustees “turned their back on the well-being of the young students in their care,” all in an effort to “preserve the institution's prestige and prevent scandal from ripping through their sport program.”
The lawsuit was filed Friday in Santa Clara County Superior Court. Dharap's law firm joined with the Los Angeles firm of John Manley, who helped secure a $500 million settlement with Michigan State University in 2018 over allegations it ignored complaints from Olympic gymnasts about university physician Larry Nassar, who sexually abused them during treatment sessions. It was the largest-ever settlement against a university involving sexual assault allegations.
At San Jose State, more than a dozen members of the women's swim team first came forward in 2009, accusing Shaw of touching them inappropriately under their bras and underwear during treatment sessions. The university conducted an inhouse investigation that cleared Shaw in 2010, finding his sports massages that touched the women's private areas were “bona fide” treatment. Shaw was allowed to continue treating female athletes, largely unfettered, until he left the university in 2020, after yet another alleged victim came forward.
Swim coach Sage Hopkins, a whistleblower who kept up a decadelong crusade to protect the athletes, has said he was inspired by the Michigan State scandal to finally take his long-ignored concerns outside the university to the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Only then did Papazian — who first learned of the allegations when she arrived at the university in 2016 — order a new investigation, which determined that Shaw had abused the women.
Even that renewed investigation, however, was deeply flawed, according to the U.S. Department of Justice, which last fall ordered the university to pay a total of $1.6 million to about two dozen identified victims. The DOJ also ordered the university to reach out to more than 1,000 female athletes who were treated by Shaw over his 14-year tenure to determine if others were abused.
If a monetary verdict is reached or the university settles the class-action lawsuit, victims then can step forward confidentially to make a claim, Dharap said.
“The question is, has San Jose State truly been held accountable?” Dharap asked. “The class action is a means to find that out and to ensure that all those folks do get justice.”