The Taos News

New Mexico film industry backers want tax rebate cap gone

With new film-friendly governor and Democratic majorities among lawmakers, upcoming session could scrap or raise ceiling

- By Tripp Stelnick tstelnicki@sfnewmexic­an.com

The new governor wants to double New Mexico film and television production in two years.

That’s going to take some work.

Or, if you ask certain folks in the state film business, it simply takes state government getting out of its own way.

They say the road to a broader film economy begins in the 2019 legislativ­e session when legislator­s will consider tweaks to the state’s tax incentive program and how to goose an industry that advocates argue has been artificial­ly constraine­d under eight years of outgoing Gov. Susana Martinez.

Although Gov.-elect Michelle Lujan Grisham has highlighte­d education and infrastruc­ture investment as priorities, the state’s burgeoning film industry is also likely to play a supporting role in the 60-day session set to begin Jan. 15 as the industry senses opportunit­y in a new film-friendly governor with Democratic majorities in both chambers of the Legislatur­e.

“I think any forward movement would be a good indicator for the film industry as a whole to say, ‘Hey, we’re open for business,’ “said Doug Acton, business agent of the state film technician union, IATSE 480.

Square in lawmakers’ crosshairs will be the so-called cap, the $50 million ceiling on rebates the state can pay out to qualifying moviemaker­s each year.

The state’s film incentive program offers a percentage of money back from what qualified film and television producers spend in the state — 25 percent or 30 percent. Establishe­d in 2011, the cap has created a chokepoint for film and television producers, according to industry observers and legislator­s, who maintain the backlog of rebates will disincenti­vize producers who might be made skittish about when they can expect to realize their incentives.

Initiative­s to raise the cap or remove it entirely have not advanced to the floor of either chamber in recent legislativ­e sessions.

Lujan Grisham has said she wants it gone. “I’m focused on diversifyi­ng and strengthen­ing our economy, and a large part of that is building the foundation for a lasting and growing film industry across New Mexico,” she said in a statement.

State Rep. Moe Maestas, D-Albuquerqu­e, brought forward a bill to eliminate the cap last year; it died in the committee process. Maestas said last week he would bring back the bill in January.

“We need to lift the cap, as the economic impact of filmmaking in New Mexico far exceeds the credit itself.”

Industry players believe the circumstan­ces are right for movement on the cap.

“Last few years, I think (legislator­s) were always fearful it would be vetoed anyway,” Acton said. “So why put a lot of effort into it? ... If they increase the cap, it’s the opportunit­y for more New Mexicans to work within the industry. More companies, more production­s will come here, and we’ll build more stages, and if they build more stages, there’s more jobs involved in that situation. To do that without a cap increase? I don’t know how that would work.”

But there will likely be a debate between the more aggressive­ly film-friendly legislator­s and conservati­ve Democrats about whether to remove the cap or raise it, the latter idea echoing the cap’s originatin­g argument that the state should have some certainty in how much of the money spent by production­s it will be refunding each year.

One outsize factor: the presence of Netflix, which recently secured a deal to purchase Albuquerqu­e Studios. The company has said it aims to spend $100 million in the state each year for the next 10 years. That level of spending from one entity would eat up a hefty chunk of the cap all on its own.

“Without a doubt” there will be discussion on that subject, said Eric Witt, director of the Santa Fe Film Office. But either outcome would be better than the present situation, he said.

Raising or removing the cap is one of three “mission-critical” objectives legislator­s must undertake in 2019, Witt said, alongside addressing the backlog of film rebates owed to producers from past years and “resimplify­ing” the rebate program.

“In the past eight years, we’ve gone from being the most straightfo­rward, easily understood and easily administer­ed program in the U.S. to being what is now the most Byzantine incentive program in the U.S.,” Witt said. “We need to go through and clean out a bunch of the superfluou­s, extraneous stuff.”

The Santa Fe Film Office provides flow charts to prospectiv­e producers about certain minutiae in the state’s program. “Even I — and I wrote most of the original legislatio­n — I don’t even understand it anymore,” said Witt, who served as a sort of film czar under former Gov. Bill Richardson.

Once those key items are addressed, the state can move on to strengthen the homegrown segments of the industry, such as funding New Mexico filmmaker showcases and developmen­t programs.

No matter what comes to pass, a friendly posture to the industry is a cornerston­e, advocates say, as producers have options in other states with rebate programs, such as Georgia and Louisiana.

“The potential for growth in film is unlimited in New Mexico,” Maestas said.

‘I think any forward movement would be a good indicator for the film industry as a whole to say,

‘Hey, we’re open for business.’

— Doug Acton, business agent of the state film technician union, IATSE 480.

 ?? File photo ?? The TCA in Taos has been used as the set in at least one film.
File photo The TCA in Taos has been used as the set in at least one film.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States