The Times Herald (Norristown, PA)

This is what special prosecutor­s do

- Byron York Columnist

Do you think Tony Podesta, the longtime Washington Democratic lobbyist, fixer and brother of Hillary Clinton campaign manager John Podesta, colluded with Russia to allow Donald Trump to win the 2016 election? Neither do I. Do you think Vin Weber — the longtime Washington Republican lobbyist and former member of the House who opposed Trump and said he would not stay in the GOP if Trump won — colluded with Russia to allow Donald Trump to win the 2016 election? Neither do I. No one in his or her right mind would place Podesta or Weber in a plot to help Russia put Trump in the White House. Yet both men, apparently, have fallen into the snare of the Robert Mueller special prosecutor investigat­ion.

Podesta is reportedly in Mueller’s crosshairs because Paul Manafort, the former Trump campaign chairman who is a key figure in the Mueller probe, brought Podesta into his work for something called the European Center for a Modern Ukraine back in 2012. Does anyone know how Podesta’s involvemen­t, even if shady and suspect, furthered the alleged Russia-Trump conspiracy to win the White House? Neither do I. Now there are reports that Weber has been caught up in the same investigat­ion as Podesta. “Investigat­ors on Mueller’s team have asked about what the lobbyists knew about the source of the funding and who was directing the work in 2012 — long before Manafort became Trump’s campaign chairman in 2016,” the Associated Press reported.

Does anyone know how Weber’s work in 2012 — long before he became a NeverTrump­er — helped Trump get elected? Neither do I. Go back to May 17 of this year. Attorney General Jeff Sessions had recused himself from the Russia investigat­ion, and then President Trump fired FBI Director Comey, and then Rod Rosenstein, number-two at the Justice Department, appointed Mueller as special prosecutor.

And what was Mueller appointed to do? First, “to conduct the investigat­ion confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligen­ce on March 20, 2017,” the order said — a reference to the FBI counter-intelligen­ce probe of Russian involvemen­t in the 2016 election.

As part of that, Mueller was authorized to investigat­e “any links and/or coordinati­on between the Russian government and individual­s associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump.” It seems far-fetched to include Podesta and Weber in that category.

Mueller was also authorized to investigat­e “any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigat­ion.” Does that include Podesta and Weber? It probably depends on your definition of the word “directly” — and your sense of basic fairness.

Mueller was also authorized to investigat­e “any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. 600.4(a).”

Finally, there was this in Mueller’s charge: “If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriat­e, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigat­ion of these matters.”

Maybe that is where Podesta and Weber come in.

Whatever the case, what appears to be happening is what has happened in other Washington special prosecutor investigat­ions (and the old independen­t counsel investigat­ions).

They expand. They ensnare people who might have had nothing to do with whatever the original subject of the investigat­ion was. And they go on and on.

When Mueller was first appointed, some Republican­s nearly tripped over themselves saying what a great appointmen­t it was. “Robert Mueller is superb choice to be special counsel,” Newt Gingrich tweeted on May 17. “His reputation is impeccable for honesty and integrity.” Other Republican­s said much the same to me in conversati­ons at the time.

Some, including Gingrich, later changed their minds. But the issue is not whether Robert Mueller is or is not a good man.

The issue is the immutable law of Washington special prosecutor investigat­ions, no matter who is running them. Of course Mueller already appears to be venturing afield from his original assignment. That’s what special prosecutor­s do.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States