The Times-Tribune

Expand liquefied gas exports


As the world looks for new energy supplies, one option is to increase the use of clean-burning liquefied natural gas. It is low in carbon and plentiful and doesn’t have the economic and environmen­tal problems associated with coal.

The United States is the most logical supplier of liquefied gas. Our country is the world’s No. 1 producer of natural gas. The Potential Gas Committee, a coalition of utilities and production companies, estimates that America possesses potential supplies of more than 2,800 trillion cubic feet of natural gas that will exceed demand for a century or more.

Regardless of views on a new era of liquefied gas exports — whether seen from its effect on the U.S. economy, our commitment to free trade, the energy security of our allies in Europe and Asia, or the potential for a significan­t reduction in air pollution and carbon emissions from a coal-to-natural gas switch in electricit­y production — the results will be far-reaching and beneficial.

Some maintain that liquefied gas exports could harm U.S. consumers if exports reach a level in which domestic resources become tight and gas prices rise. Some chemical and fertilizer companies that rely on large amounts of low-cost gas for production say that U.S. gas supplies should be used for manufactur­ing in this country, not for sale overseas. But the availabili­ty of gas hasn’t been a problem for many years. Thanks to the shale revolution and new innovation­s in drilling, gas production continues to grow annually. It’s time to put the ghosts of our energy past to bed.

U.S. exports of liquefied gas began earlier this year at Cheniere Energy’s Sabine Pass terminal in Louisiana. The first cargo was delivered to Brazil in February. In October, there were nine shipments from the Louisiana terminal to foreign countries. China and Japan are huge potential markets for liquefied gas, as are countries in central and eastern Europe. Those regions are eager to get access to U.S. gas as a way to break Russia’s grip on their economies.

Four other U.S. liquefied gas terminal are under constructi­on and 30 more applicatio­ns to export it are pending before the Department of Energy. Several have been under review for years and with no breakthrou­gh in sight, the bureaucrat­ic logjam keeps getting worse.

Action is long overdue on legislatio­n streamlini­ng and speeding up the licensing process.

That should be high on the energy agenda of the Trump administra­tion and Congress. Without changes in the licensing process that eliminate overlappin­g reviews by the Department of Energy and as many as 20 different state and federal agencies, the bottleneck will continue and the United States will be at a disadvanta­ge in competing with other liquefied gas exporters, namely Australia and Indonesia. Both countries are building export capabiliti­es in hopes of snagging a large part of the Asian market.

Make no mistake, U.S. shale-gas producers in the Marcellus region have a lot at stake in this. If the gas that’s being produced in this country is not sold, drilling will decline and thousands of working people will lose their jobs.

Exporting liquefied gas is in our national interest. A great deal depends on improving the permitting process.

 ??  ?? INTERVAL
John Interval is a petroleum geologist in Bridgevill­e, Allegheny County.
INTERVAL John Interval is a petroleum geologist in Bridgevill­e, Allegheny County.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States