The Trentonian (Trenton, NJ)

Budget talks resume amid pessimism over border difference­s

- By Jonathan Lemire and Alan Fram

WASHINGTON >> Politicall­y freighted border security negotiatio­ns are teetering just days before a potential new government shutdown. The turmoil is testing the changed balance of power in Washington, with lawmakers engaged in a sparring match over immigratio­n policy that is challengin­g their ability to reach any accord.

Republican­s say Democratic demands to limit immigrant detentions by federal authoritie­s are a deal breaker — eclipsing the border wall issue for now — and represent overreach by top Democrats like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California.

The two sides also remained separated over how much to spend on President Donald Trump’s promised border wall. A Friday midnight deadline is looming to prevent a second partial government shutdown.

Lawmakers hoped to get the talks back on track at a meeting on Monday afternoon.

Rep. Kay Granger of Texas, one of the Republican negotiator­s, gave an upbeat assessment. She said the talks are in “better shape today” and expressed optimism about reaching a deal before the deadline.

The plan is to keep pushing for a deal, in part because the underlying spending measure funds a bevy of Cabinet department­s and represents months of work on Capitol Hill. A collapse of the negotiatio­ns could imperil budget talks going forward that are required to prevent steep spending cuts to the Pentagon and domestic agencies.

But the negotiatio­ns hit a rough patch Sunday amid a dispute over curbing Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t, or ICE, the federal agency that Republican­s see as an emblem of tough immigratio­n policies and Democrats accuse of often going too far.

Trump blamed Democrats in the migrant detention dispute, tweeting, “The Democrats do not want us to detain, or send back, criminal aliens! This is a brand new demand. Crazy!”

Trump met Monday afternoon with top advisers in the Oval Office to discuss the negotiatio­ns before heading to Texas for a rally. Asked by reporters if there was going to be another shutdown, Trump replied: “That’s up to the Democrats.”

The fight over ICE detentions goes to the core of each party’s view on immigratio­n. Republican­s favor rigid enforcemen­t of immigratio­n laws and have little interest in easing them if Democrats refuse to fund the Mexican border wall. Democrats despise the proposed wall and, in return for border security funds, want to curb what they see as unnecessar­ily harsh enforcemen­t by ICE.

People involved in the talks say Democrats have proposed limiting the number of immigrants here illegally who are caught inside the U.S. — not at the border — that the agency can detain. Republican­s say they don’t want that cap to apply to immigrants caught committing crimes, but Democrats do.

“ICE is being asked to ignore the laws that Congress has already passed,” said ICE Deputy Director Matt Albence on a media call organized by the White House. “It will be extremely damaging to the public safety of this country. If we are forced to live within a cap based on interior arrests we will immediatel­y be forced to release criminal aliens that are currently sitting in our custody.”

Democrats say they proposed their cap to force ICE to concentrat­e its internal enforcemen­t efforts on dangerous immigrants, not those who lack legal authority to be in the country but are productive and otherwise pose no threat. Democrats have proposed reducing the current number of beds ICE uses to detain immigrants here illegally from 40,520 to 35,520.

But within that limit, they’ve also proposed limiting to 16,500 the number for immigrants here illegally caught within the U.S., including criminals. Republican­s want no caps on the number of immigrants who’ve committed crimes who can be held by ICE. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called the proposed limits on detention beds “absurd.”

Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, in appearance­s on NBC’s “Meet the Press” and “Fox News Sunday,” said “you absolutely cannot” eliminate the possibilit­y of another shutdown if a deal is not reached over the wall and other border matters. The White House had asked for $5.7 billion, a figure rejected by the Democratic­controlled House.

“I think talks are stalled right now,” Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., said on “Fox News Sunday.” “I’m not confident we’re going to get there.”

But Mulvaney did signal that the White House would prefer not to have a repeat of the last shutdown, which stretched more than a month, left more than 800,000 government workers without paychecks, forced a postponeme­nt of the State of the Union address and sent Trump’s poll numbers tumbling. As support in his own party began to splinter, Trump surrendere­d after the shutdown hit 35 days without getting money for the wall.

 ??  ??
 ?? ANDREW HARNIK — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? House Appropriat­ions Committee Chair Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters as she arrives for a closeddoor meeting at the Capitol as bipartisan House and Senate bargainers trying to negotiate a border security compromise in hope of avoiding another government shutdown on Capitol Hill, Monday in Washington.
ANDREW HARNIK — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS House Appropriat­ions Committee Chair Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters as she arrives for a closeddoor meeting at the Capitol as bipartisan House and Senate bargainers trying to negotiate a border security compromise in hope of avoiding another government shutdown on Capitol Hill, Monday in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States