The Trentonian (Trenton, NJ)

More should emulate tennis group’s stand

-

The Women’s Tennis Associatio­n recently did something that’s as rare as a blizzard in July. It put morality before money. The organizati­on should be applauded for that, and others should follow its courageous lead.

If you haven’t heard, the WTA, the governing body of women’s profession­al tennis, has ordered its tournament­s suspended in China — a move that could cost the organizati­on $1 billion in revenue.

The reason for the suspension? WTA chief executive Steve Simon wants to see real proof that Chinese pro tennis player Peng Shuai “is free, safe and not subject to censorship, coercion and intimidati­on.”

Peng has basically disappeare­d after she made a sexual assault allegation against a close ally of President Xi Jinping.

Since her allegation, the only reported Peng sighting came via a video call with the Internatio­nal Olympic Committee. Officials at the IOC then concluded that she was fine.

Of course, that video hasn’t been made public, which makes its validity dubious at best, especially since the IOC has a vested interest in not rocking the Chinese boat.

Beijing is set to host the Winter Olympic Games in February, an event that will produce billions of dollars in revenue for the IOC.

It’s clear that the IOC is not willing to take the same brave steps as the WTA.

What makes the IOC inaction even sadder is the fact that Chinese

human-rights abuses extend far beyond Peng.

The brutal Chinese regime is also enslaving Uyghur Muslims, crushing dissent in Hong Kong, threatenin­g neighborin­g Taiwan and polluting the world environmen­t.

Yet the IOC does nothing, trotting out its old trope that politics and sports shouldn’t mix.

Diplomatic boycott: At least the Biden Administra­tion will enact a diplomatic boycott of the Beijing Olympics. That means that there won’t be an official U.S. delegation at Beijing, but that U.S. athletes and coaches can still participat­e.

A number of other western nations have joined that diplomatic boycott.

It’s a half measure, at best, but it’s at least a signal that current Chinese behavior is unacceptab­le, without also punishing the American athletes, who have worked a lifetime for their Olympic opportunit­ies.

Taking away athletic opportunit­ies isn’t the answer to punishing bad behavior. A boycott didn’t work in Moscow in 1980 and it won’t work now.

What may work is punishing China economical­ly.

That’s why other businesses and organizati­ons should use the WTA as an example and eliminate, or at least limit, their investment­s in China.

Yes, the economic hardships of such actions would likely flow both ways, and U.S. businesses, and the American economy as a whole, may suffer.

In the end, however, financial punishment may be the only language that China understand­s.

It’s far past time for major Olympic corporate sponsors such as Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, Toyota and Visa to reexamine their continued associatio­n with the Chinese government and the Olympic movement.

A lone voice in the wilderness: Is there any chance that will happen? About as much chance as snow in July.

Money, as it almost always does, will trump morality.

In the meantime, the WTA will remain a lone voice crying in the wilderness against injustice.

Maybe someday, some others will heed their heroic clarion call.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States