North Carolina race shines a light on ‘bal­lot har­vest­ing’

The Tribune (SLO) - - News - BY MATT VOLZ

HE­LENA, MONT.

An in­ves­ti­ga­tion into whether po­lit­i­cal op­er­a­tives in North Carolina il­le­gally col­lected and pos­si­bly stole ab­sen­tee bal­lots in a still-un­de­cided con­gres­sional race has drawn at­ten­tion to a wide­spread but lit­tle-known po­lit­i­cal tool called bal­lot har­vest­ing.

It’s a prac­tice long used by spe­cial-in­ter­est groups and both ma­jor po­lit­i­cal par­ties that is viewed ei­ther as a voter ser­vice that boosts turnout or a ne­far­i­ous ac­tiv­ity that sub­jects vot­ers to in­tim­i­da­tion and makes elec­tions vul­ner­a­ble to fraud.

The groups rely on data show­ing which vot­ers re­quested ab­sen­tee bal­lots but have not turned them in. They then go door-todoor and of­fer to col­lect and turn in those bal­lots for the vot­ers – of­ten dozens or hun­dreds at a time. Some place bal­lot-col­lec­tion boxes in high-con­cen­tra- tion voter ar­eas, such as col­lege cam­puses, and take the bal­lots to elec­tion of­fices when the boxes are full.

In North Carolina, elec­tion of­fi­cials are in­ves­ti­gat­ing whether Re­pub­li­can po­lit­i­cal op­er­a­tives har­vested bal­lots in parts of the 9th Con­gres­sional Dis­trict with high num­bers of Demo­cratic vot­ers and then did not turn them in to the lo­cal elec­tions of­fice. Bal­lot har­vest­ing is il­le­gal un­der state law, which al­lows only a fam­ily mem­ber or le­gal guardian to drop off ab­sen­tee bal­lots for a voter.

The in­ves­ti­ga­tion is fo­cus­ing on ar­eas in the dis­trict where an un­usu­ally high num­ber of ab­sen­tee bal­lots were not re­turned.

Re­pub­li­can Mark Har­ris leads Demo­crat Dan McCready by 905 votes, but the state elec­tions board has re­fused to cer­tify the re­sults. The head of the state Re­pub­li­can Party said Thurs­day that he would be open to hold­ing a new elec­tion if there is ev­i­dence of fraud.

Sup­port­ers of bal­lot har­vest­ing say they worry the North Carolina elec­tion may give an im­por­tant cam­paign tool an un­nec­es­sary black eye. These groups see their mis­sion as help­ing vot­ers who are busy with work or car­ing for chil­dren, and em­pow­er­ing those who are sick, el­derly and poor. Col­lect­ing bal­lots to turn in at a cen­tral­ized vot­ing hub also has been an im­por­tant tool for decades on ex­pan­sive and re­mote Na­tive Amer­i­can reser­va­tions.

Sev­eral states have tried to limit bal­lot har­vest­ing by re­strict­ing who can turn in an­other per­son’s bal­lot. In Ari­zona, a video that showed a vol­un­teer drop­ping off hun­dreds of bal­lots at a polling place led to an anti-bal­lot har­vest­ing law in 2016.

“I think at any level, Re­pub­li­can, Demo­crat or any­thing, it’s wrong. It’s a ter­ri­ble prac­tice,” said for­mer Ari­zona Re­pub­li­can Party chair­man Robert Gra­ham. “Peo­ple should be re­spon­si­ble for their own votes.”

ANITA SNOW AP file

Rivko Knox, a vol­un­teer with the League of Women Vot­ers, col­lects sig­na­tures for a bal­lot mea­sure in Glen­dale, Ariz., in April. A judge in Au­gust up­held a 2016 Ari­zona law that bans groups from col­lect­ing early mail-in bal­lots from vot­ers and de­liv­er­ing them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.