The Ukiah Daily Journal

A conservati­onist’s perspectiv­e

- By Roger Sternberg Roger Sternberg served as the Pacific Forest Trust’s Forestland Conservati­on Director and the Mendocino Land Trust’s Executive Director. He is a Registered Profession­al Forester and consults with nonprofit organizati­ons, government­al a

I have recently read articles on the proposed Timber Harvest Plans on Jackson Demonstrat­ion State Forest (JDSF) and the campaign to set aside 20,000 acres of JDSF as a forest preserve. As a person who has spent 40 years working as both a land conservati­on profession­al and forester, I’d like to share my thoughts on the campaign

1) JDSF’S Mission and Role: The legislativ­e intent in establishi­ng JDSF was to use its 48,000+ acres to demonstrat­e various approaches to managing a working forest so that this informatio­n can be shared with forest landowners and forest managers.

JDSF is a working laboratory that provides important research and demonstrat­es methods for reducing sediment delivery to creeks, the effect of forest management on subsurface hydrology and the applicatio­n of various silvicultu­ral methods on forest growth. I know of no other place in the state where this kind of critical applied research is consistent­ly occurring.

JDSF’S role is particular­ly important given the major fires that have recently destroyed not only working forests, but also old growth redwood preserves. How to protect both resources is a major question, and many forest stewards look to JDSF to help provide the answers.

In my case, I am working with a number of landowners who want to re-establish old growth/ Late Seral forests, but we’re finding that leaving them alone fails to respond to the need to reduce fuel loads and build forest resiliency. Ironically, active forest management in preserves, including removing the understory, prescribed burning, and conservati­ve thinnings are now tools that are being applied in the effort to preserve the preserves. We have a lot to learn about forest stewardshi­p in the age of climate change and catastroph­ic fire, and this is where JDSF can play a critical role in demonstrat­ing what approaches are most effective.

2) JDSF Forest Management Practices: To suggest that JDSF is destroying critical redwood forest is fundamenta­lly inaccurate. Since its establishm­ent in 1949, JDSF has been transforme­d from a forest that was overcut and depleted of much of its non-timber forest values to vibrant working forest that most of us in the field envy. This was accomplish­ed not by locking up the resource, but building it back up by cutting less than 50 percent of what the forest is growing annually and in averaging less than 3% of its land base being harvested annually.

Undoubtedl­y, JDSF could improve its forest management, as could all of us involved in management of complex forest ecosystems. But JDSF’S approach to forest management demonstrab­ly focuses not just on timber management, but building forest resiliency from wildfire, improving and protecting wildlife habitat, riparian corridors, and recreation­al opportunit­ies. Simultaneo­us to the management of its timber resource, JDSF’S non-timber resources have also been restored. Just a few of these resources include:

• 76 Northern Spotted Owl “Activity Centers” (nest and other high-use areas)

• 459 acres of old growth reserves thousands of old growth trees (reserved via a no-cut policy)

• 12,234 acres of forestland managed primarily for non-timber values, including riparian corridors for salmonids, areas set aside for marbled murrelets, and special treatment areas adjacent to the Woodlands State Park and other State Parks

It is also critically important to understand the extent to which public scrutiny of JDSF’S forest management occurs. Five different agencies, including the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and Regional Water Quality Board, need to approve each THP that is submitted by JDSF, which also entails review of requisite wildlife, plant, and archaeolog­ical surveys. Equally important is the input from JDSF’S Advisory Group, which regularly reviews proposed THPS, as well as the JSDF Recreation Task Force. Compositio­n of both of these groups is made of a broad spectrum of community members.

3) Economic Benefits: At the same time that JDSF provides the aforementi­oned non-economic benefits, it also provides a significan­t amount of both direct and indirect employment. In the last 10 years, timber harvesting has resulted in the employment of about 1,300 people, and annually JDSF employs 20 full-time and 6-10 part-time staff.

In addition, Mendocino

County benefits directly by receiving about a half a million dollars annually from timber taxes.

Unlike our wonderful State Parks in the County, which are funded via tax revenues and have a huge amount of deferred maintenanc­e to address, JDSF is a real bargain for us taxpayers, as it is selffunded via timber sales. These revenues enable JDSF to not only actively maintain its roads to prevent soil erosion and sediment delivery to creeks, but also its recreation­al trails, which are free for public use.

4) State Parks and National Forests in Mendocino County and in the State: Mendocino County is blessed with about 24,000 acres of State Park lands, including old growth reserves at Montgomery Woods and Hendy Woods. In addition, the Mendocino National Forest contains 913,306 acres of land, including 180,000 acres of the Yolo Bolly Wilderness Area, with the remaining acreage for all intents and purposes not managed for timber production. Stepping outside our county, there are approximat­ely 243,000 acres of coastal redwood State Parks stretching from the Oregon border south to Monterey County. These are fabulous assets that have been set aside for the public, belying the need for further preserves.

Decades ago, conservati­onist, forester, and author of a “Sand County Almanac,” Aldo Leopold, advocated for treating our natural resources not just as a commodity, but as a community of which humans were only a part. He saw this “land ethic” as a process, not something that can be reached with finality. I believe that JDSF is modeling this approach via its forest stewardshi­p. It could generate much more revenue from timber sales, but it has elected — to our great benefit—to temper commoditiz­ation with other human and natural values. I respectful­ly submit that JDSF is working well, and we not fix what isn’t broken.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States